Explaining the Uncertain: Stochastic Shapley Values for Gaussian Process Models
Siu Lun Chau, Krikamol Muandet, Dino Sejdinovic
Abstract
We present a novel approach for explaining Gaussian processes (GPs) that can utilize the full analytical covariance structure present in GPs. Our method is based on the popular solution concept of Shapley values extended to stochastic cooperative games, resulting in explanations that are random variables. The GP explanations generated using our approach satisfy similar favorable axioms to standard Shapley values and possess a tractable covariance function across features and data observations. This covariance allows for quantifying explanation uncertainties and studying the statistical dependencies between explanations. We further extend our framework to the problem of predictive explanation, and propose a Shapley prior over the explanation function to predict Shapley values for new data based on previously computed ones. Our extensive illustrations demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed approach. * Equal contribution. Preprint. Under review.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext e15674dd-17b3-47d1-bda8-708f0279b0a9Cited by top-tier papers7
- Integral Imprecise Probability MetricsSiu Lun Chau, Michele Caprio, Krikamol MuandetNeurIPS 2025 · 15 citations
- SHAP Meets Tensor Networks: Provably Tractable Explanations with ParallelismReda Marzouk, Shahaf Bassan, Guy KatzNeurIPS 2025 · 9 citations
- Exact Shapley Attributions in Quadratic-time for FANOVA Gaussian ProcessesMajid Mohammadi, Krikamol Muandet, Ilaria Tiddi, Annette ten Teije et al.AAAI 2026 · 7 citations
- Explaining Probabilistic Models with Distributional ValuesLuca Franceschi, Michele Donini, Cédric Archambeau, Matthias W. SeegerICML 2024 · 4 citations
- Verified SHAP: Provable Bounds for Exact Shapley Values of Neural NetworksDavid Boetius, Shahaf Bassan, Guy Katz, Stefan Leue et al.ICML 2026
Builds on9
- Understanding Global Feature Contributions With Additive Importance MeasuresIan Covert, Scott M. Lundberg, Su-In LeeNeurIPS 2020 · 476 citations
- Asymmetric Shapley values: incorporating causal knowledge into model-agnostic explainabilityChristopher Frye, Colin Rowat, Ilya FeigeNeurIPS 2020 · 246 citations
- Reliable Post hoc Explanations: Modeling Uncertainty in ExplainabilityDylan Slack, Anna Hilgard, Sameer Singh, Himabindu LakkarajuNeurIPS 2021 · 240 citations
- Causal Shapley Values: Exploiting Causal Knowledge to Explain Individual Predictions of Complex ModelsTom Heskes, Evi Sijben, Ioan Gabriel Bucur, Tom ClaassenNeurIPS 2020 · 235 citations
- On Locality of Local Explanation ModelsSahra Ghalebikesabi, Lucile Ter-Minassian, Karla DiazOrdaz, Chris C. HolmesNeurIPS 2021 · 52 citations
Related papers
- Explaining Predictive Uncertainty with Information Theoretic Shapley ValuesDavid S. Watson, Joshua O'Hara, Niek Tax, Richard Mudd et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 56 citations
- Problems with Shapley-value-based explanations as feature importance measuresI. Elizabeth Kumar, Suresh Venkatasubramanian, Carlos Scheidegger, Sorelle A. FriedlerICML 2020 · 458 citations
- GStarX: Explaining Graph Neural Networks with Structure-Aware Cooperative GamesShichang Zhang, Yozen Liu, Neil Shah, Yizhou SunNeurIPS 2022 · 79 citations
- Shapley Residuals: Quantifying the limits of the Shapley value for explanationsIndra Kumar, Carlos Scheidegger, Suresh Venkatasubramanian, Sorelle A. FriedlerNeurIPS 2021 · 82 citations
- Explaining Reinforcement Learning with Shapley ValuesDaniel Beechey, Thomas M. S. Smith, Özgür SimsekICML 2023 · 41 citations
