Explaining Predictive Uncertainty with Information Theoretic Shapley Values
David S. Watson, Joshua O'Hara, Niek Tax, Richard Mudd, Ido Guy
Abstract
Researchers in explainable artificial intelligence have developed numerous methods for helping users understand the predictions of complex supervised learning models. By contrast, explaining the of model outputs has received relatively little attention. We adapt the popular Shapley value framework to explain various types of predictive uncertainty, quantifying each feature's contribution to the conditional entropy of individual model outputs. We consider games with modified characteristic functions and find deep connections between the resulting Shapley values and fundamental quantities from information theory and conditional independence testing. We outline inference procedures for finite sample error rate control with provable guarantees, and implement efficient algorithms that perform well in a range of experiments on real and simulated data. Our method has applications to covariate shift detection, active learning, feature selection, and active feature-value acquisition.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext e157901e-4cfc-4bb4-9ec6-290031767fd2Cited by top-tier papers3
- A Comprehensive Study of Shapley Value in Data AnalyticsHong Lin, Shixin Wan, Zhongle Xie, Ke Chen et al.VLDB 2025 · 4 citations
- Verified SHAP: Provable Bounds for Exact Shapley Values of Neural NetworksDavid Boetius, Shahaf Bassan, Guy Katz, Stefan Leue et al.ICML 2026
- Quantifying and Understanding Uncertainty in Large Reasoning ModelsYangyi Li, Chenxu Zhao, Mengdi HuaiACL 2026
Builds on8
- The Many Shapley Values for Model ExplanationMukund Sundararajan, Amir NajmiICML 2020 · 799 citations
- On the Tractability of SHAP ExplanationsGuy Van den Broeck, Anton Lykov, Maximilian Schleich, Dan SuciuAAAI 2021 · 485 citations
- Understanding Global Feature Contributions With Additive Importance MeasuresIan Covert, Scott M. Lundberg, Su-In LeeNeurIPS 2020 · 476 citations
- Reliable Post hoc Explanations: Modeling Uncertainty in ExplainabilityDylan Slack, Anna Hilgard, Sameer Singh, Himabindu LakkarajuNeurIPS 2021 · 240 citations
- Causal Shapley Values: Exploiting Causal Knowledge to Explain Individual Predictions of Complex ModelsTom Heskes, Evi Sijben, Ioan Gabriel Bucur, Tom ClaassenNeurIPS 2020 · 235 citations
Related papers
- Explaining the Uncertain: Stochastic Shapley Values for Gaussian Process ModelsSiu Lun Chau, Krikamol Muandet, Dino SejdinovicNeurIPS 2023 · 35 citations
- Explaining Probabilistic Models with Distributional ValuesLuca Franceschi, Michele Donini, Cédric Archambeau, Matthias W. SeegerICML 2024 · 4 citations
- RKHS-SHAP: Shapley Values for Kernel MethodsSiu Lun Chau, Robert Hu, Javier González, Dino SejdinovicNeurIPS 2022 · 49 citations
- Problems with Shapley-value-based explanations as feature importance measuresI. Elizabeth Kumar, Suresh Venkatasubramanian, Carlos Scheidegger, Sorelle A. FriedlerICML 2020 · 458 citations
- WeightedSHAP: analyzing and improving Shapley based feature attributionsYongchan Kwon, James Y. ZouNeurIPS 2022 · 60 citations
