Explaining Probabilistic Models with Distributional Values
Luca Franceschi, Michele Donini, Cédric Archambeau, Matthias W. Seeger
Abstract
A large branch of explainable machine learning is grounded in cooperative game theory. However, research indicates that game-theoretic explanations may mislead or be hard to interpret. We argue that often there is a critical mismatch between what one wishes to explain (e.g. the output of a classifier) and what current methods such as SHAP explain (e.g. the scalar probability of a class). This paper addresses such gap for probabilistic models by generalising cooperative games and value operators. We introduce the distributional values, random variables that track changes in the model output (e.g. flipping of the predicted class) and derive their analytic expressions for games with Gaussian, Bernoulli and Categorical payoffs. We further establish several characterising properties, and show that our framework provides fine-grained and insightful explanations with case studies on vision and language models.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Builds on15
- The Many Shapley Values for Model ExplanationMukund Sundararajan, Amir NajmiICML 2020 · 799 citations
- Understanding Global Feature Contributions With Additive Importance MeasuresIan Covert, Scott M. Lundberg, Su-In LeeNeurIPS 2020 · 476 citations
- Problems with Shapley-value-based explanations as feature importance measuresI. Elizabeth Kumar, Suresh Venkatasubramanian, Carlos Scheidegger, Sorelle A. FriedlerICML 2020 · 458 citations
- Asymmetric Shapley values: incorporating causal knowledge into model-agnostic explainabilityChristopher Frye, Colin Rowat, Ilya FeigeNeurIPS 2020 · 246 citations
- Reliable Post hoc Explanations: Modeling Uncertainty in ExplainabilityDylan Slack, Anna Hilgard, Sameer Singh, Himabindu LakkarajuNeurIPS 2021 · 240 citations
Related papers
- Explaining the Uncertain: Stochastic Shapley Values for Gaussian Process ModelsSiu Lun Chau, Krikamol Muandet, Dino SejdinovicNeurIPS 2023 · 35 citations
- "Why did the Model Fail?": Attributing Model Performance Changes to Distribution ShiftsHaoran Zhang, Harvineet Singh, Marzyeh Ghassemi, Shalmali JoshiICML 2023 · 37 citations
- Neural Payoff Machines: Predicting Fair and Stable Payoff Allocations Among Team MembersDaphne Cornelisse, Thomas Rood, Yoram Bachrach, Mateusz Malinowski et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 10 citations
- Explaining Reinforcement Learning with Shapley ValuesDaniel Beechey, Thomas M. S. Smith, Özgür SimsekICML 2023 · 41 citations
- Explaining Object Detectors via Collective Contribution of PixelsToshinori Yamauchi, Hiroshi Kera, Kazuhiko KawamotoCVPR 2026
