Asymmetric Shapley values: incorporating causal knowledge into model-agnostic explainability
Christopher Frye, Colin Rowat, Ilya Feige
Abstract
Explaining AI systems is fundamental both to the development of high performing models and to the trust placed in them by their users. The Shapley framework for explainability has strength in its general applicability combined with its precise, rigorous foundation: it provides a common, model-agnostic language for AI explainability and uniquely satisfies a set of intuitive mathematical axioms. However, Shapley values are too restrictive in one significant regard: they ignore all causal structure in the data. We introduce a less restrictive framework, Asymmetric Shapley values (ASVs), which are rigorously founded on a set of axioms, applicable to any AI system, and flexible enough to incorporate any causal structure known to be respected by the data. We demonstrate that ASVs can (i) improve model explanations by incorporating causal information, (ii) provide an unambiguous test for unfair discrimination in model predictions, (iii) enable sequentially incremental explanations in time-series models, and (iv) support feature-selection studies without the need for model retraining.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 402c2bba-a325-408f-bfa5-5df78b53e50bCited by top-tier papers41
- Problems with Shapley-value-based explanations as feature importance measuresI. Elizabeth Kumar, Suresh Venkatasubramanian, Carlos Scheidegger, Sorelle A. FriedlerICML 2020 · 458 citations
- Causal Shapley Values: Exploiting Causal Knowledge to Explain Individual Predictions of Complex ModelsTom Heskes, Evi Sijben, Ioan Gabriel Bucur, Tom ClaassenNeurIPS 2020 · 235 citations
- Explaining Black-Box Algorithms Using Probabilistic Contrastive CounterfactualsSainyam Galhotra, Romila Pradhan, Babak SalimiSIGMOD 2021 · 85 citations
- Generative causal explanations of black-box classifiersMatthew R. O'Shaughnessy, Gregory Canal, Marissa Connor, Christopher Rozell et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 83 citations
- Shapley Residuals: Quantifying the limits of the Shapley value for explanationsIndra Kumar, Carlos Scheidegger, Suresh Venkatasubramanian, Sorelle A. FriedlerNeurIPS 2021 · 82 citations
Builds on2
Related papers
- Shapley explainability on the data manifoldChristopher Frye, Damien de Mijolla, Tom Begley, Laurence Cowton et al.ICLR 2021 · 125 citations
- Towards Trustable SHAP ScoresOlivier Létoffé, Xuanxiang Huang, João Marques-SilvaAAAI 2025 · 23 citations
- RankSHAP: Shapley Value Based Feature Attributions for Learning to RankTanya Chowdhury, Yair Zick, James AllanICLR 2025
- Explaining Reinforcement Learning with Shapley ValuesDaniel Beechey, Thomas M. S. Smith, Özgür SimsekICML 2023 · 41 citations
- Enhancing Interpretability for Vision Models via Shapley Value OptimizationKanglong Fan, Yunqiao Yang, Chen MaAAAI 2026
