Shapley Residuals: Quantifying the limits of the Shapley value for explanations
Indra Kumar, Carlos Scheidegger, Suresh Venkatasubramanian, Sorelle A. Friedler
Abstract
Popular feature importance techniques compute additive approximations to nonlinear models by first defining a cooperative game describing the value of different subsets of the model's features, then calculating the resulting game's Shapley values to attribute credit additively between the features. However, the specific modeling settings in which the Shapley values are a poor approximation for the true game have not been well-described. In this paper we utilize an interpretation of Shapley values as the result of an orthogonal projection between vector spaces to calculate a residual representing the kernel component of that projection. We provide an algorithm for computing these residuals, characterize different modeling settings based on the value of the residuals, and demonstrate that they capture information about model predictions that Shapley values cannot. Shapley residuals can thus act as a warning to practitioners against overestimating the degree to which Shapley-value-based explanations give them insight into a model.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext cbed3010-238f-44bf-8a77-923668ec8966Cited by top-tier papers9
- Beyond TreeSHAP: Efficient Computation of Any-Order Shapley Interactions for Tree EnsemblesMaximilian Muschalik, Fabian Fumagalli, Barbara Hammer, Eyke HüllermeierAAAI 2024 · 35 citations
- Towards Trustable SHAP ScoresOlivier Létoffé, Xuanxiang Huang, João Marques-SilvaAAAI 2025 · 23 citations
- Energy-Based Learning for Cooperative Games, with Applications to Valuation Problems in Machine LearningYatao Bian, Yu Rong, Tingyang Xu, Jiaxiang Wu et al.ICLR 2022 · 17 citations
- Provably Better Explanations with Optimized Aggregation of Feature AttributionsThomas Decker, Ananta R. Bhattarai, Jindong Gu, Volker Tresp et al.ICML 2024 · 7 citations
- Unlocking the Game: Estimating Games in Möbius Representation for Explanation and High-Order Interaction DetectionMajid Mohammadi, Ilaria Tiddi, Annette ten TeijeAAAI 2025 · 4 citations
Builds on6
- The Many Shapley Values for Model ExplanationMukund Sundararajan, Amir NajmiICML 2020 · 799 citations
- Algorithmic Transparency via Quantitative Input Influence: Theory and Experiments with Learning SystemsAnupam Datta, Shayak Sen, Yair ZickS&P 2016 · 774 citations
- Interpreting Interpretability: Understanding Data Scientists' Use of Interpretability Tools for Machine LearningHarmanpreet Kaur, Harsha Nori, Samuel Jenkins, Rich Caruana et al.CHI 2020 · 541 citations
- Problems with Shapley-value-based explanations as feature importance measuresI. Elizabeth Kumar, Suresh Venkatasubramanian, Carlos Scheidegger, Sorelle A. FriedlerICML 2020 · 458 citations
- Asymmetric Shapley values: incorporating causal knowledge into model-agnostic explainabilityChristopher Frye, Colin Rowat, Ilya FeigeNeurIPS 2020 · 246 citations
Related papers
- Support Vector-based Estimation of Multilinear Games for Feature Selection and ExplanationMajid Mohammadi, Ilaria Tiddi, Annette ten TeijeAAAI 2025 · 1 citation
- WeightedSHAP: analyzing and improving Shapley based feature attributionsYongchan Kwon, James Y. ZouNeurIPS 2022 · 60 citations
- Causal Shapley Values: Exploiting Causal Knowledge to Explain Individual Predictions of Complex ModelsTom Heskes, Evi Sijben, Ioan Gabriel Bucur, Tom ClaassenNeurIPS 2020 · 235 citations
- Linear tree shapPeng Yu, Albert Bifet, Jesse Read, Chao XuNeurIPS 2022 · 27 citations
- Interventional SHAP Values and Interaction Values for Piecewise Linear Regression TreesArtjom Zern, Klaus Broelemann, Gjergji KasneciAAAI 2023 · 27 citations
