WeightedSHAP: analyzing and improving Shapley based feature attributions
Yongchan Kwon, James Y. Zou
Abstract
Shapley value is a popular approach for measuring the influence of individual features. While Shapley feature attribution is built upon desiderata from game theory, some of its constraints may be less natural in certain machine learning settings, leading to unintuitive model interpretation. In particular, the Shapley value uses the same weight for all marginal contributions -- i.e. it gives the same importance when a large number of other features are given versus when a small number of other features are given. This property can be problematic if larger feature sets are more or less informative than smaller feature sets. Our work performs a rigorous analysis of the potential limitations of Shapley feature attribution. We identify simple settings where the Shapley value is mathematically suboptimal by assigning larger attributions for less influential features. Motivated by this observation, we propose WeightedSHAP, which generalizes the Shapley value and learns which marginal contributions to focus directly from data. On several real-world datasets, we demonstrate that the influential features identified by WeightedSHAP are better able to recapitulate the model's predictions compared to the features identified by the Shapley value.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 58da8c7c-e6b8-4419-a759-2736f10adcbcCited by top-tier papers19
- Data-OOB: Out-of-bag Estimate as a Simple and Efficient Data ValueYongchan Kwon, James ZouICML 2023 · 54 citations
- Stochastic Amortization: A Unified Approach to Accelerate Feature and Data AttributionIan Covert, Chanwoo Kim, Su-In Lee, James Y. Zou et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 25 citations
- Regression-adjusted Monte Carlo Estimators for Shapley Values and Probabilistic ValuesR. Teal Witter, Yurong Liu, Christopher MuscoNeurIPS 2025 · 22 citations
- Stability Guarantees for Feature Attributions with Multiplicative SmoothingAnton Xue, Rajeev Alur, Eric WongNeurIPS 2023 · 18 citations
- One Sample Fits All: Approximating All Probabilistic Values Simultaneously and EfficientlyWeida Li, Yaoliang YuNeurIPS 2024 · 14 citations
Builds on10
- The Many Shapley Values for Model ExplanationMukund Sundararajan, Amir NajmiICML 2020 · 799 citations
- Understanding Global Feature Contributions With Additive Importance MeasuresIan Covert, Scott M. Lundberg, Su-In LeeNeurIPS 2020 · 476 citations
- Problems with Shapley-value-based explanations as feature importance measuresI. Elizabeth Kumar, Suresh Venkatasubramanian, Carlos Scheidegger, Sorelle A. FriedlerICML 2020 · 458 citations
- Causal Shapley Values: Exploiting Causal Knowledge to Explain Individual Predictions of Complex ModelsTom Heskes, Evi Sijben, Ioan Gabriel Bucur, Tom ClaassenNeurIPS 2020 · 235 citations
- Neuron Shapley: Discovering the Responsible NeuronsAmirata Ghorbani, James Y. ZouNeurIPS 2020 · 160 citations
Related papers
- The Shapley Taylor Interaction IndexMukund Sundararajan, Kedar Dhamdhere, Ashish AgarwalICML 2020 · 199 citations
- Joint Shapley values: a measure of joint feature importanceChris Harris, Richard Pymar, Colin RowatICLR 2022 · 32 citations
- Provably Accurate Shapley Value Estimation via Leverage Score SamplingChristopher Musco, R. Teal WitterICLR 2025
- Shapley Residuals: Quantifying the limits of the Shapley value for explanationsIndra Kumar, Carlos Scheidegger, Suresh Venkatasubramanian, Sorelle A. FriedlerNeurIPS 2021 · 82 citations
- Rethinking Shapley Value for Negative Interactions in Non-convex GamesWonjoon Chang, Myeongjin Lee, Jaesik ChoiICLR 2025
