Joint Shapley values: a measure of joint feature importance
Chris Harris, Richard Pymar, Colin Rowat
Abstract
The Shapley value is one of the most widely used measures of feature importance partly as it measures a feature's average effect on a model's prediction. We introduce joint Shapley values, which directly extend Shapley's axioms and intuitions: joint Shapley values measure a set of features' average contribution to a model's prediction. We prove the uniqueness of joint Shapley values, for any order of explanation. Results for games show that joint Shapley values present different insights from existing interaction indices, which assess the effect of a feature within a set of features. The joint Shapley values provide intuitive results in ML attribution problems. With binary features, we present a presence-adjusted global value that is more consistent with local intuitions than the usual approach. Published as a conference paper at ICLR 2022 SY symmetry : If two agents add equal worth to all coalitions that they can both join then they receive equal value: . This is strictly weaker than anonymity. Now extend each of these axioms in natural ways to conditions on sets rather than singletons. Below, φ S (v) denotes an index for coalition S on game v. JLI joint linearity : φ is a linear function on G N , i.e. φ(v + w) = φ(v) + φ(w) and φ(av) = aφ(v) for any v, w ∈ G N and a ∈ R. (This axiom has not been modified.) JNU joint null : A coalition that adds no worth to any coalition has no value, i.e. if v(S ∪T ) = v(S) for all S ⊆ N T , then φ T (v) = 0. JEF joint efficiency : The sum of the values of all coalitions up to cardinality k is equal to the worth of the entire set, i.e. for all v ∈ G N , JAN joint anonymity : For any σ on N and any v ∈ G N , φ T (v) = φ σ(T ) (σv), for all T ⊆ N . JSY joint symmetry : If two coalitions perform equally when joining coalitions that they can both join and for other coalitions they add no worth then they receive an equal value, i.e. if Axiom JSY only equates the joint Shapley values for coalitions T and T ′ if they contribute identically to coalitions that they may both join, and contribute nothing to the other coalitions. Axioms JLI, JEF and JAN are all also used in Dhamdhere et al. (2020). Our joint null and joint symmetry notions appear to be new: they reflect our interest in a set of features' contribution to a model's predictions, so that the set's cardinality should not play a role in determining its value. JOINT SHAPLEY VALUES Our main result is that there is a unique solution to axioms JLI, JNU, JEF, JAN and JSY, the joint Shapley value. The uniqueness is up to the k th order of explanation; we say nothing about |T | > k.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers4
- Measuring the Effect of Training Data on Deep Learning Predictions via Randomized ExperimentsJinkun Lin, Anqi Zhang, Mathias Lécuyer, Jinyang Li et al.ICML 2022 · 70 citations
- Beyond TreeSHAP: Efficient Computation of Any-Order Shapley Interactions for Tree EnsemblesMaximilian Muschalik, Fabian Fumagalli, Barbara Hammer, Eyke HüllermeierAAAI 2024 · 35 citations
- KernelSHAP-IQ: Weighted Least Square Optimization for Shapley InteractionsFabian Fumagalli, Maximilian Muschalik, Patrick Kolpaczki, Eyke Hüllermeier et al.ICML 2024 · 20 citations
- Towards Attributions of Input Variables in a CoalitionXinhao Zheng, Huiqi Deng, Quanshi ZhangICML 2025
Builds on2
Related papers
- SHAP-IQ: Unified Approximation of any-order Shapley InteractionsFabian Fumagalli, Maximilian Muschalik, Patrick Kolpaczki, Eyke Hüllermeier et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 80 citations
- The Many Shapley Values for Model ExplanationMukund Sundararajan, Amir NajmiICML 2020 · 799 citations
- WeightedSHAP: analyzing and improving Shapley based feature attributionsYongchan Kwon, James Y. ZouNeurIPS 2022 · 60 citations
- Problems with Shapley-value-based explanations as feature importance measuresI. Elizabeth Kumar, Suresh Venkatasubramanian, Carlos Scheidegger, Sorelle A. FriedlerICML 2020 · 458 citations
- Rethinking Shapley Value for Negative Interactions in Non-convex GamesWonjoon Chang, Myeongjin Lee, Jaesik ChoiICLR 2025
