Measuring the Effect of Training Data on Deep Learning Predictions via Randomized Experiments
Jinkun Lin, Anqi Zhang, Mathias Lécuyer, Jinyang Li, Aurojit Panda, Siddhartha Sen
Abstract
We develop a new, principled algorithm for estimating the contribution of training data points to the behavior of a deep learning model, such as a specific prediction it makes. Our algorithm estimates the AME, a quantity that measures the expected (average) marginal effect of adding a data point to a subset of the training data, sampled from a given distribution. When subsets are sampled from the uniform distribution, the AME reduces to the well-known Shapley value. Our approach is inspired by causal inference and randomized experiments: we sample different subsets of the training data to train multiple submodels, and evaluate each submodel's behavior. We then use a LASSO regression to jointly estimate the AME of each data point, based on the subset compositions. Under sparsity assumptions ( datapoints have large AME), our estimator requires only randomized submodel trainings, improving upon the best prior Shapley value estimators.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers25
- TRAK: Attributing Model Behavior at ScaleSung Min Park, Kristian Georgiev, Andrew Ilyas, Guillaume Leclerc et al.ICML 2023 · 260 citations
- Data-OOB: Out-of-bag Estimate as a Simple and Efficient Data ValueYongchan Kwon, James ZouICML 2023 · 54 citations
- Rethinking Backdoor AttacksAlaa Khaddaj, Guillaume Leclerc, Aleksandar Makelov, Kristian Georgiev et al.ICML 2023 · 42 citations
- Intriguing Properties of Data Attribution on Diffusion ModelsXiaosen Zheng, Tianyu Pang, Chao Du, Jing Jiang et al.ICLR 2024 · 41 citations
- DataMIL: Selecting Data for Robot Imitation Learning with DatamodelsShivin Dass, Alaa Khaddaj, Logan Engstrom, Aleksander Madry et al.ICLR 2026 · 34 citations
Builds on12
- Neural Cleanse: Identifying and Mitigating Backdoor Attacks in Neural NetworksBolun Wang, Yuanshun Yao, Shawn Shan, Huiying Li et al.S&P 2019 · 1,801 citations
- Manipulating Machine Learning: Poisoning Attacks and Countermeasures for Regression LearningMatthew Jagielski, Alina Oprea, Battista Biggio, Chang Liu et al.S&P 2018 · 867 citations
- Estimating Training Data Influence by Tracing Gradient DescentGarima Pruthi, Frederick Liu, Satyen Kale, Mukund SundararajanNeurIPS 2020 · 784 citations
- What Neural Networks Memorize and Why: Discovering the Long Tail via Influence EstimationVitaly Feldman, Chiyuan ZhangNeurIPS 2020 · 674 citations
- Asymmetric Shapley values: incorporating causal knowledge into model-agnostic explainabilityChristopher Frye, Colin Rowat, Ilya FeigeNeurIPS 2020 · 246 citations
Related papers
- A Distributional Framework For Data ValuationAmirata Ghorbani, Michael P. Kim, James ZouICML 2020 · 152 citations
- Shapley Value Approximation Based on k-Additive GamesGuilherme Dean Pelegrina, Patrick Kolpaczki, Eyke HüllermeierAAAI 2026
- Localized Data Shapley: Accelerating Valuation for Nearest Neighbor AlgorithmsGuangyi Zhang, Yanhao Wang, Chengliang Chai, Qiyu Liu et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 1 citation
- Scaling Laws for the Value of Individual Data Points in Machine LearningIan Connick Covert, Wenlong Ji, Tatsunori Hashimoto, James ZouICML 2024 · 12 citations
- FastSHAP: Real-Time Shapley Value EstimationNeil Jethani, Mukund Sudarshan, Ian Connick Covert, Su-In Lee et al.ICLR 2022 · 186 citations
