Causal Shapley Values: Exploiting Causal Knowledge to Explain Individual Predictions of Complex Models
Tom Heskes, Evi Sijben, Ioan Gabriel Bucur, Tom Claassen
Abstract
Shapley values underlie one of the most popular model-agnostic methods within explainable artificial intelligence. These values are designed to attribute the difference between a model's prediction and an average baseline to the different features used as input to the model. Being based on solid game-theoretic principles, Shapley values uniquely satisfy several desirable properties, which is why they are increasingly used to explain the predictions of possibly complex and highly non-linear machine learning models. Shapley values are well calibrated to a user's intuition when features are independent, but may lead to undesirable, counterintuitive explanations when the independence assumption is violated. In this paper, we propose a novel framework for computing Shapley values that generalizes recent work that aims to circumvent the independence assumption. By employing Pearl's do-calculus, we show how these 'causal' Shapley values can be derived for general causal graphs without sacrificing any of their desirable properties. Moreover, causal Shapley values enable us to separate the contribution of direct and indirect effects. We provide a practical implementation for computing causal Shapley values based on causal chain graphs when only partial information is available and illustrate their utility on a real-world example.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext a10c9fd3-cf3c-422e-8d25-664a99fe4f69Cited by top-tier papers30
- WeightedSHAP: analyzing and improving Shapley based feature attributionsYongchan Kwon, James Y. ZouNeurIPS 2022 · 60 citations
- Explaining Predictive Uncertainty with Information Theoretic Shapley ValuesDavid S. Watson, Joshua O'Hara, Niek Tax, Richard Mudd et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 56 citations
- RKHS-SHAP: Shapley Values for Kernel MethodsSiu Lun Chau, Robert Hu, Javier González, Dino SejdinovicNeurIPS 2022 · 49 citations
- Shapley Counterfactual Credits for Multi-Agent Reinforcement LearningJiahui Li, Kun Kuang, Baoxiang Wang, Furui Liu et al.KDD 2021 · 49 citations
- On Measuring Causal Contributions via do-interventionsYonghan Jung, Shiva Prasad Kasiviswanathan, Jin Tian, Dominik Janzing et al.ICML 2022 · 36 citations
Builds on3
- Algorithmic Transparency via Quantitative Input Influence: Theory and Experiments with Learning SystemsAnupam Datta, Shayak Sen, Yair ZickS&P 2016 · 774 citations
- Problems with Shapley-value-based explanations as feature importance measuresI. Elizabeth Kumar, Suresh Venkatasubramanian, Carlos Scheidegger, Sorelle A. FriedlerICML 2020 · 458 citations
- Asymmetric Shapley values: incorporating causal knowledge into model-agnostic explainabilityChristopher Frye, Colin Rowat, Ilya FeigeNeurIPS 2020 · 246 citations
Related papers
- Shapley explainability on the data manifoldChristopher Frye, Damien de Mijolla, Tom Begley, Laurence Cowton et al.ICLR 2021 · 125 citations
- Towards Trustable SHAP ScoresOlivier Létoffé, Xuanxiang Huang, João Marques-SilvaAAAI 2025 · 23 citations
- Incorporating Information into Shapley Values: Reweighting via a Maximum Entropy ApproachDarya Biparva, Donatello MaterassiICML 2024 · 1 citation
- Provably Accurate Shapley Value Estimation via Leverage Score SamplingChristopher Musco, R. Teal WitterICLR 2025
- RankSHAP: Shapley Value Based Feature Attributions for Learning to RankTanya Chowdhury, Yair Zick, James AllanICLR 2025
