On Measuring Causal Contributions via do-interventions
Yonghan Jung, Shiva Prasad Kasiviswanathan, Jin Tian, Dominik Janzing, Patrick Blöbaum, Elias Bareinboim
Abstract
Causal contributions measure the strengths of different causes to a target quantity. Understanding causal contributions is important in empirical sciences and data-driven disciplines since it allows to answer practical queries like "what are the contributions of each cause to the effect?" In this paper, we develop a principled method for quantifying causal contributions. First, we provide desiderata of properties (axioms) that causal contribution measures should satisfy and propose the do-Shapley values (inspired by do-interventions (Pearl, 2000) ) as a unique method satisfying these properties. Next, we develop a criterion under which the do-Shapley values can be efficiently inferred from non-experimental data. Finally, we provide do-Shapley estimators exhibiting consistency, computational feasibility, and statistical robustness. Simulation results corroborate with the theory.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 890f2bb9-198a-4318-8649-e8fb37e29cdfCited by top-tier papers11
- "Why did the Model Fail?": Attributing Model Performance Changes to Distribution ShiftsHaoran Zhang, Harvineet Singh, Marzyeh Ghassemi, Shalmali JoshiICML 2023 · 37 citations
- Practical do-Shapley Explanations with Estimand-Agnostic Causal InferenceÁlvaro Parafita, Tomas Garriga, Axel Brando, Francisco J. CazorlaNeurIPS 2025 · 6 citations
- Multiply-Robust Causal Change AttributionVictor Quintas-Martinez, Mohammad Taha Bahadori, Eduardo Santiago, Jeff Mu et al.ICML 2024 · 5 citations
- Estimating Joint Treatment Effects by Combining Multiple ExperimentsYonghan Jung, Jin Tian, Elias BareinboimICML 2023 · 5 citations
- Exactly Computing do-Shapley ValuesR. Teal Witter, Álvaro Parafita, Tomas Garriga, Maximilian Muschalik et al.ICML 2026 · 3 citations
Builds on10
- The Many Shapley Values for Model ExplanationMukund Sundararajan, Amir NajmiICML 2020 · 799 citations
- Asymmetric Shapley values: incorporating causal knowledge into model-agnostic explainabilityChristopher Frye, Colin Rowat, Ilya FeigeNeurIPS 2020 · 246 citations
- Causal Shapley Values: Exploiting Causal Knowledge to Explain Individual Predictions of Complex ModelsTom Heskes, Evi Sijben, Ioan Gabriel Bucur, Tom ClaassenNeurIPS 2020 · 235 citations
- Causal structure-based root cause analysis of outliersKailash Budhathoki, Lenon Minorics, Patrick Blöbaum, Dominik JanzingICML 2022 · 88 citations
- Estimating Identifiable Causal Effects through Double Machine LearningYonghan Jung, Jin Tian, Elias BareinboimAAAI 2021 · 70 citations
Related papers
- Collaborative Causal Inference with Fair IncentivesRui Qiao, Xinyi Xu, Bryan Kian Hsiang LowICML 2023 · 8 citations
- Incorporating Information into Shapley Values: Reweighting via a Maximum Entropy ApproachDarya Biparva, Donatello MaterassiICML 2024 · 1 citation
- Flow-based Attribution in Graphical Models: A Recursive Shapley ApproachRaghav Singal, George Michailidis, Hoiyi NgICML 2021 · 13 citations
- RankSHAP: Shapley Value Based Feature Attributions for Learning to RankTanya Chowdhury, Yair Zick, James AllanICLR 2025
- Measuring the Effect of Training Data on Deep Learning Predictions via Randomized ExperimentsJinkun Lin, Anqi Zhang, Mathias Lécuyer, Jinyang Li et al.ICML 2022 · 70 citations
