Neural Payoff Machines: Predicting Fair and Stable Payoff Allocations Among Team Members
Daphne Cornelisse, Thomas Rood, Yoram Bachrach, Mateusz Malinowski, Tal Kachman
Abstract
In many multi-agent settings, participants can form teams to achieve collective outcomes that may far surpass their individual capabilities. Measuring the relative contributions of agents and allocating them shares of the reward that promote long-lasting cooperation are difficult tasks. Cooperative game theory offers solution concepts identifying distribution schemes, such as the Shapley value, that fairly reflect the contribution of individuals to the performance of the team or the Core, which reduces the incentive of agents to abandon their team. Applications of such methods include identifying influential features and sharing the costs of joint ventures or team formation. Unfortunately, using these solutions requires tackling a computational barrier as they are hard to compute, even in restricted settings. In this work, we show how cooperative game-theoretic solutions can be distilled into a learned model by training neural networks to propose fair and stable payoff allocations. We show that our approach creates models that can generalize to games far from the training distribution and can predict solutions for more players than observed during training. An important application of our framework is Explainable AI: our approach can be used to speed-up Shapley value computations on many instances.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers3
- Game-theoretic Counterfactual Explanation for Graph Neural NetworksChirag Chhablani, Sarthak Jain, Akshay Channesh, Ian A. Kash et al.WWW 2024 · 14 citations
- Encoding Human Behavior in Information Design through Deep LearningGuanghui Yu, Wei Tang, Saumik Narayanan, Chien-Ju HoNeurIPS 2023 · 8 citations
- ε-fractional core stability in Hedonic GamesSimone Fioravanti, Michele Flammini, Bojana Kodric, Giovanna VarricchioNeurIPS 2023 · 5 citations
Builds on5
- Algorithmic Transparency via Quantitative Input Influence: Theory and Experiments with Learning SystemsAnupam Datta, Shayak Sen, Yair ZickS&P 2016 · 774 citations
- Emergent Tool Use From Multi-Agent AutocurriculaBowen Baker, Ingmar Kanitscheider, Todor M. Markov, Yi Wu et al.ICLR 2020 · 751 citations
- Neuron Shapley: Discovering the Responsible NeuronsAmirata Ghorbani, James Y. ZouNeurIPS 2020 · 160 citations
- Collaborative Machine Learning with Incentive-Aware Model RewardsRachael Hwee Ling Sim, Yehong Zhang, Mun Choon Chan, Bryan Kian Hsiang LowICML 2020 · 158 citations
- If You Like Shapley Then You'll Love the CoreTom Yan, Ariel D. ProcacciaAAAI 2021 · 85 citations
Related papers
- Rethinking Shapley Value for Negative Interactions in Non-convex GamesWonjoon Chang, Myeongjin Lee, Jaesik ChoiICLR 2025
- Training Characteristic Functions with Reinforcement Learning: XAI-methods play Connect FourStephan Wäldchen, Sebastian Pokutta, Felix HuberICML 2022 · 9 citations
- Explaining Reinforcement Learning with Shapley ValuesDaniel Beechey, Thomas M. S. Smith, Özgür SimsekICML 2023 · 41 citations
- Approximating the Shapley Value without Marginal ContributionsPatrick Kolpaczki, Viktor Bengs, Maximilian Muschalik, Eyke HüllermeierAAAI 2024 · 43 citations
- Problems with Shapley-value-based explanations as feature importance measuresI. Elizabeth Kumar, Suresh Venkatasubramanian, Carlos Scheidegger, Sorelle A. FriedlerICML 2020 · 458 citations
