An Optimal Tradeoff between Entanglement and Copy Complexity for State Tomography
Sitan Chen, Jerry Li, Allen Liu
Abstract
There has been significant interest in understanding how practical constraints on contemporary quantum devices impact the complexity of quantum learning. For the classic question of tomography, recent work [6] tightly characterized the copy complexity for any protocol that can only measure one copy of the unknown state at a time, showing it is polynomially worse than if one can make fully-entangled measurements. While we now have a fairly complete picture of the rates for such tasks in the near-term and fault-tolerant regimes, it remains poorly understood what the landscape in between these extremes looks like, and in particular how to gracefully scale up our protocols as we transition away from NISQ.
In this work, we study tomography in the natural setting where one can make measurements of t copies at a time. For sufficiently small ǫ, we show that for any t ≤ d 2 , Θ( d 3 √ tǫ 2 ) copies are necessary and sufficient to learn an unknown d-dimensional state ρ to trace distance ǫ. This gives a smooth and optimal interpolation between the known rates for single-copy measurements and fully-entangled measurements.
To our knowledge, this is the first smooth entanglement-copy tradeoff known for any quantum learning task, and for tomography, no intermediate point on this curve was known, even at t = 2. An important obstacle is that unlike the optimal single-copy protocol [24,17], the optimal fully-entangled protocol [18,30] is inherently a biased estimator. This bias precludes naive batching approaches for interpolating between the two protocols. Instead, we devise a novel two-stage procedure that uses Keyl's algorithm [23] to refine a crude estimate for ρ based on single-copy measurements. A key insight is to use Schur-Weyl sampling not to estimate the spectrum of ρ, but to estimate the deviation of ρ from the maximally mixed state. When ρ is far from the maximally mixed state, we devise a novel quantum splitting procedure that reduces to the case where ρ is close to maximally mixed.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext d73afffd-fa5b-47f8-956a-5540d4d91e8fCited by top-tier papers6
- The Debiased Keyl's Algorithm: A New Unbiased Estimator for Full State TomographyAngelos Pelecanos, Jack Spilecki, John WrightSTOC 2026 · 22 citations
- Optimal Tradeoffs for Estimating Pauli ObservablesSitan Chen, Weiyuan Gong, Qi YeFOCS 2024 · 13 citations
- A General Quantum Duality for Representations of Groups with Applications to Quantum Money, Lightning, and FireJohn Bostanci, Barak Nehoran, Mark ZhandrySTOC 2025 · 2 citations
- Testing and Learning Structured Quantum HamiltoniansSrinivasan Arunachalam, Arkopal Dutt, Francisco Escudero GutiérrezSTOC 2025 · 1 citation
- Pauli Measurements Are Not Optimal for Single-Copy TomographyJayadev Acharya, Abhilash Dharmavarapu, Yuhan Liu, Nengkun YuSTOC 2025 · 1 citation
Builds on6
- Exponential Separations Between Learning With and Without Quantum MemorySitan Chen, Jordan Cotler, Hsin-Yuan Huang, Jerry LiFOCS 2021 · 79 citations
- Improved Quantum data analysisCostin Badescu, Ryan O'DonnellSTOC 2021 · 40 citations
- Entanglement is Necessary for Optimal Quantum Property TestingSébastien Bubeck, Sitan Chen, Jerry LiFOCS 2020 · 33 citations
- Tight Bounds for Quantum State Certification with Incoherent MeasurementsSitan Chen, Jerry Li, Brice Huang, Allen LiuFOCS 2022 · 19 citations
- When Does Adaptivity Help for Quantum State Learning?Sitan Chen, Brice Huang, Jerry Li, Allen Liu et al.FOCS 2023 · 12 citations
Related papers
- Beating full state tomography for unentangled spectrum estimationAngelos Pelecanos, Xinyu Tan, Ewin Tang, John WrightSODA 2026
- Instance-Optimal Quantum State Certification with Entangled MeasurementsRyan O'Donnell, Chirag WadhwaSTOC 2026 · 14 citations
- Dimension Independent and Computationally Efficient Shadow TomographyPulkit SinhaSTOC 2025 · 1 citation
- Online Learning of Pure States is as Hard as Mixed StatesMaxime Meyer, Soumik Adhikary, Naixu Guo, Patrick RebentrostNeurIPS 2025 · 3 citations
- Distributed Quantum inner product estimationAnurag Anshu, Zeph Landau, Yunchao LiuSTOC 2022 · 27 citations
