Testing and Learning Structured Quantum Hamiltonians
Srinivasan Arunachalam, Arkopal Dutt, Francisco Escudero Gutiérrez
Abstract
We consider the problems of testing and learning an unknown -qubit quantum Hamiltonian expressed in its Pauli basis, from queries to its evolution operator under the normalized Frobenius norm. To this end, we prove the following results (with and without quantum memory) for Hamiltonians whose Pauli spectrum involves only -local terms or has sparsity at most : (1) Local Hamiltonians: We give a tolerant testing protocol to decide if a Hamiltonian is -close to -local or -far from -local, with queries, thereby solving two open questions posed in a recent work by Bluhm, Caro and Oufkir [BCO'24]. For learning a -local Hamiltonian up to error , we give a protocol with query complexity and total time evolution . Our algorithm leverages the non-commutative Bohnenblust-Hille inequality in order to get a complexity independent of . (2) Sparse Hamiltonians: We give a protocol for testing whether a Hamiltonian is -close to being -sparse or -far from being -sparse, with queries. For learning up to error , we show that queries suffices. (3) Learning without quantum memory: The learning results stated above have no dependence on the system size , but require -qubit quantum memory. We give subroutines that allow us to reproduce all the above learning results without quantum memory; increasing the query complexity by a (log)-factor in the local case and an -factor in the sparse case. (4) Testing without quantum memory: We give a new subroutine called Pauli hashing, which allows one to tolerantly test -sparse Hamiltonians using query complexity. A key ingredient is showing that -sparse Pauli channels can be tested in a tolerant fashion as being -close to being -sparse or -far under the diamond norm, using queries via Pauli hashing. In order to prove these results, we prove new structural theorems for local Hamiltonians, sparse Pauli channels and sparse Hamiltonians. We complement our learning algorithms with lower bounds that are polynomially weaker. Furthermore, our algorithms use short time evolutions and do not assume prior knowledge of the terms on which the Pauli spectrum is supported on, i.e., we do not require prior knowledge about the support of the Hamiltonian terms.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext b4c67b35-82a3-4db0-bf47-94352bd00a11Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on8
- Exponential Separations Between Learning With and Without Quantum MemorySitan Chen, Jordan Cotler, Hsin-Yuan Huang, Jerry LiFOCS 2021 · 79 citations
- Optimal learning of quantum Hamiltonians from high-temperature Gibbs statesJeongwan Haah, Robin Kothari, Ewin TangFOCS 2022 · 35 citations
- Testing and Learning Quantum Juntas Nearly OptimallyThomas Chen, Shivam Nadimpalli, Henry YuenSODA 2023 · 18 citations
- Learning Quantum Hamiltonians at Any Temperature in Polynomial TimeAinesh Bakshi, Allen Liu, Ankur Moitra, Ewin TangSTOC 2024 · 14 citations
- Optimal Tradeoffs for Estimating Pauli ObservablesSitan Chen, Weiyuan Gong, Qi YeFOCS 2024 · 13 citations
Related papers
- Structure Learning of Hamiltonians from Real-Time EvolutionAinesh Bakshi, Allen Liu, Ankur Moitra, Ewin TangFOCS 2024 · 7 citations
- Learning the Structure of Any Hamiltonian from Minimal AssumptionsAndrew ZhaoSTOC 2025 · 1 citation
- Learning quantum Gibbs states locally and efficientlyChi-Fang Chen, Anurag Anshu, Quynh T. NguyenFOCS 2025 · 13 citations
- On the Role of Entanglement and Statistics in LearningSrinivasan Arunachalam, Vojtech Havlícek, Louis SchatzkiNeurIPS 2023 · 11 citations
- Clifford Testing: Algorithms and Lower BoundsMarcel Hinsche, Zongbo Bao, Philippe van Dordrecht, Jens Eisert et al.STOC 2026 · 4 citations
