Pauli Measurements Are Not Optimal for Single-Copy Tomography
Jayadev Acharya, Abhilash Dharmavarapu, Yuhan Liu, Nengkun Yu
Abstract
Quantum state tomography is a fundamental problem in quantum computing. Given n copies of an unknown N -qubit state ρ ∈ C d×d , d = 2 N , the goal is to learn the state up to an accuracy ε in trace distance, say with at least constant probability 0.99. We are interested in the copy complexity, the minimum number of copies of ρ needed to fulfill the task. As current quantum devices are physically limited, Pauli measurements have attracted significant attention due to their ease of implementation. However, a large gap exists in the literature for tomography with Pauli measurements. The best-known upper bound is ), and no non-trivial lower bound is known besides the general single-copy lower bound of Ω( 8 N ε 2 ), achieved by hard-to-implement structured POVMs such as MUB, SIC-POVM, and uniform POVM. We have made significant progress on this long-standing problem. We first prove a stronger upper bound of O( 10 N ε 2 ). To complement it, we also obtain a lower bound of Ω( 9.118 N ε 2 ), which holds even with adaptivity. To our knowledge, this demonstrates the first known separation between Pauli measurements and structured POVMs. The new lower bound is a consequence of a novel framework for adaptive quantum state tomography with measurement constraints. The main advantage is that we can use measurement-dependent hard instances to prove tight lower bounds for Pauli measurements, while prior lower-bound techniques for tomography only work with measurement-independent constructions. Moreover, we connect the copy complexity lower bound of tomography to the eigenvalues of the measurement information channel, which governs the measurement's capacity to distinguish between states. To demonstrate the generality of the new framework, we obtain tight bounds for adaptive quantum state tomography with k-outcome measurements, where we recover existing results and establish new ones.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext b8d2a24e-9c96-48bf-aead-ee95fd9e3fc0Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on5
- Exponential Separations Between Learning With and Without Quantum MemorySitan Chen, Jordan Cotler, Hsin-Yuan Huang, Jerry LiFOCS 2021 · 79 citations
- Entanglement is Necessary for Optimal Quantum Property TestingSébastien Bubeck, Sitan Chen, Jerry LiFOCS 2020 · 33 citations
- Tight Bounds for Quantum State Certification with Incoherent MeasurementsSitan Chen, Jerry Li, Brice Huang, Allen LiuFOCS 2022 · 19 citations
- When Does Adaptivity Help for Quantum State Learning?Sitan Chen, Brice Huang, Jerry Li, Allen Liu et al.FOCS 2023 · 12 citations
- An Optimal Tradeoff between Entanglement and Copy Complexity for State TomographySitan Chen, Jerry Li, Allen LiuSTOC 2024 · 9 citations
Related papers
- Optimal Tradeoffs for Estimating Pauli ObservablesSitan Chen, Weiyuan Gong, Qi YeFOCS 2024 · 13 citations
- Learning Distributions over Quantum Measurement OutcomesWeiyuan Gong, Scott AaronsonICML 2023 · 13 citations
- Instance-Optimal Quantum State Certification with Entangled MeasurementsRyan O'Donnell, Chirag WadhwaSTOC 2026 · 14 citations
- Adversarially Robust Quantum State Learning and TestingMaryam Aliakbarpour, Vladimir Braverman, Nai-Hui Chia, Yuhan LiuFOCS 2025
- Purest Quantum State IdentificationYingqi Yu, Honglin Chen, Jun Wu, Wei Xie et al.NeurIPS 2025
