Instance-Optimal Quantum State Certification with Entangled Measurements
Ryan O'Donnell, Chirag Wadhwa
Abstract
We consider the task of quantum state certification: given a description of a hypothesis state σ and multiple copies of an unknown state ρ, a tester aims to determine whether the two states are equal or ϵ-far in trace distance. It is known that Θ(d/ϵ 2 ) copies of ρ are necessary and sufficient for this task, assuming the tester can make entangled measurements over all copies [CHW07,OW15,BOW19]. However, these bounds are for a worst-case σ, and it is not known what the optimal copy complexity is for this problem on an instance-by-instance basis. While such instance-optimal bounds have previously been shown for quantum state certification when the tester is limited to measurements unentangled across copies [CLO22, CLHL22], they remained open when testers are unrestricted in the kind of measurements they can perform.
We address this open question by proving nearly instance-optimal bounds for quantum state certification when the tester can perform fully entangled measurements. Analogously to the unentangled setting, we show that the optimal copy complexity for certifying σ is given by the worst-case complexity times the fidelity between σ and the maximally mixed state. We prove our lower bounds using a novel quantum analogue of the Ingster-Suslina method, which is likely to be of independent interest. This method also allows us to recover the Ω(d/ϵ 2 ) lower bound for mixedness testing [OW15], i.e., certification of the maximally mixed state, with a surprisingly simple proof.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 125e6ff3-395d-412e-9f94-cc5b9bde2d1aCited by top-tier papers2
- The Debiased Keyl's Algorithm: A New Unbiased Estimator for Full State TomographyAngelos Pelecanos, Jack Spilecki, John WrightSTOC 2026 · 22 citations
- The Power of Two Bases: Robust and Copy-Optimal Certification of Nearly All Quantum States with Few-Qubit MeasurementsAndrea Coladangelo, Jerry Li, Joseph Slote, Ellen WuSTOC 2026 · 5 citations
Builds on7
- Exponential Separations Between Learning With and Without Quantum MemorySitan Chen, Jordan Cotler, Hsin-Yuan Huang, Jerry LiFOCS 2021 · 79 citations
- Entanglement is Necessary for Optimal Quantum Property TestingSébastien Bubeck, Sitan Chen, Jerry LiFOCS 2020 · 33 citations
- Distributed Quantum inner product estimationAnurag Anshu, Zeph Landau, Yunchao LiuSTOC 2022 · 27 citations
- Few Single-Qubit Measurements Suffice to Certify Any Quantum StateMeghal Gupta, William He, Ryan O'DonnellSTOC 2026 · 21 citations
- Tight Bounds for Quantum State Certification with Incoherent MeasurementsSitan Chen, Jerry Li, Brice Huang, Allen LiuFOCS 2022 · 19 citations
Related papers
- When Does Adaptivity Help for Quantum State Learning?Sitan Chen, Brice Huang, Jerry Li, Allen Liu et al.FOCS 2023 · 12 citations
- An Optimal Tradeoff between Entanglement and Copy Complexity for State TomographySitan Chen, Jerry Li, Allen LiuSTOC 2024 · 9 citations
- Beating full state tomography for unentangled spectrum estimationAngelos Pelecanos, Xinyu Tan, Ewin Tang, John WrightSODA 2026
- Single-Copy Stabilizer TestingMarcel Hinsche, Jonas HelsenSTOC 2025 · 3 citations
- Certifying Almost All Quantum States with Few Single-Qubit MeasurementsHsin-Yuan Huang, John Preskill, Mehdi SoleimanifarFOCS 2024 · 10 citations
