Beating full state tomography for unentangled spectrum estimation
Angelos Pelecanos, Xinyu Tan, Ewin Tang, John Wright
Abstract
How many copies of a mixed state ρ ∈ C d×d are needed to learn its spectrum? To date, the best known algorithms for spectrum estimation require as many copies as full state tomography, suggesting the possibility that learning a state's spectrum might be as difficult as learning the entire state. We show that this is not the case in the setting of unentangled measurements, by giving a spectrum estimation algorithm that uses n = O(d 3 • (log log(d)/ log(d)) 4 ) copies of ρ, which is asymptotically fewer than the n = Ω(d 3 ) copies necessary for full state tomography. Our algorithm is inspired by the technique of local moment matching from classical statistics, and shows how it can be applied in the quantum setting.
As an important subroutine in our spectrum estimation algorithm, we give an estimator of the k-th moment tr(ρ k ) which performs unentangled measurements and uses O(d 3-2/k ) copies of ρ in order to achieve a constant multiplicative error. This directly translates to an additive-error estimator of quantum Rényi entropy of order k with the same number of copies.
Finally, we present numerical evidence that the sample complexity of spectrum estimation can only improve over full state tomography by a sub-polynomial factor. Specifically, for spectrum learning with fully entangled measurements, we run simulations which suggest a lower bound of Ω(d 2-γ ) copies for any constant γ > 0. From this, we conclude the current best lower bound of Ω(d) is likely not tight.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 29dee588-c10b-4447-8384-ddd2da310ba9Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on6
- Entanglement is Necessary for Optimal Quantum Property TestingSébastien Bubeck, Sitan Chen, Jerry LiFOCS 2020 · 33 citations
- Distributed Quantum inner product estimationAnurag Anshu, Zeph Landau, Yunchao LiuSTOC 2022 · 27 citations
- Tight Bounds for Quantum State Certification with Incoherent MeasurementsSitan Chen, Jerry Li, Brice Huang, Allen LiuFOCS 2022 · 19 citations
- When Does Adaptivity Help for Quantum State Learning?Sitan Chen, Brice Huang, Jerry Li, Allen Liu et al.FOCS 2023 · 12 citations
- Instance Based Approximations to Profile Maximum LikelihoodNima Anari, Moses Charikar, Kirankumar Shiragur, Aaron SidfordNeurIPS 2020 · 9 citations
Related papers
- An Optimal Tradeoff between Entanglement and Copy Complexity for State TomographySitan Chen, Jerry Li, Allen LiuSTOC 2024 · 9 citations
- Instance-Optimal Quantum State Certification with Entangled MeasurementsRyan O'Donnell, Chirag WadhwaSTOC 2026 · 14 citations
- Quantum tomography using state-preparation unitariesJoran van Apeldoorn, Arjan Cornelissen, András Gilyén, Giacomo NanniciniSODA 2023 · 34 citations
- Learning Distributions over Quantum Measurement OutcomesWeiyuan Gong, Scott AaronsonICML 2023 · 13 citations
- Optimal Tradeoffs for Estimating Pauli ObservablesSitan Chen, Weiyuan Gong, Qi YeFOCS 2024 · 13 citations
