The Debiased Keyl's Algorithm: A New Unbiased Estimator for Full State Tomography
Angelos Pelecanos, Jack Spilecki, John Wright
Abstract
In the problem of quantum state tomography, one is given n copies of an unknown rank-r mixed state ρ ∈ ℂd × d and asked to produce an estimator of ρ. In this work, we present the debiased Keyl’s algorithm, the first estimator for full state tomography which is both unbiased and sample-optimal. We derive an explicit formula for the second moment of our estimator, with which we show the following five applications. First, we give a new proof that n = O(rd/ε2) copies are sufficient to learn a rank-r mixed state to trace distance error ε, which is optimal. Second, we show that n = O(rd/ε2) copies are sufficient to learn to error ε in the more challenging Bures distance, which is also optimal. Third, we consider full state tomography when one is only allowed to measure k copies at once. We show that n =O(max(d3/√kε2, d2/ε2 ) ) copies suffice to learn in trace distance. This improves on the prior work of Chen et al. and matches their lower bound. Fourth, for shadow tomography, we show that O(log(m)/ε2) copies are sufficient to learn m given observables O1, …, Om in the ”high accuracy regime”, when ε = O(1/d), improving on a result of Chen et al. More generally, we show that if tr(Oi2) ≤ F for all i, then n = O(log(m) · (min√r F/ε, F2/3/ε4/3+ 1/ε2)) copies suffice, improving on existing work. Finally, for quantum metrology, we give a locally unbiased algorithm whose mean squared error matrix is upper bounded by twice the inverse of the quantum Fisher information matrix in the asymptotic limit of large n, which is optimal.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext adcee8bd-c31a-4ea2-802a-53ea597ad80dBuilds on7
- Improved Quantum data analysisCostin Badescu, Ryan O'DonnellSTOC 2021 · 40 citations
- Query-optimal estimation of unitary channels in diamond distanceJeongwan Haah, Robin Kothari, Ryan O'Donnell, Ewin TangFOCS 2023 · 21 citations
- Instance-Optimal Quantum State Certification with Entangled MeasurementsRyan O'Donnell, Chirag WadhwaSTOC 2026 · 14 citations
- When Does Adaptivity Help for Quantum State Learning?Sitan Chen, Brice Huang, Jerry Li, Allen Liu et al.FOCS 2023 · 12 citations
- An Optimal Tradeoff between Entanglement and Copy Complexity for State TomographySitan Chen, Jerry Li, Allen LiuSTOC 2024 · 9 citations
Related papers
- Dimension Independent and Computationally Efficient Shadow TomographyPulkit SinhaSTOC 2025 · 1 citation
- Learning Distributions over Quantum Measurement OutcomesWeiyuan Gong, Scott AaronsonICML 2023 · 13 citations
- Beating full state tomography for unentangled spectrum estimationAngelos Pelecanos, Xinyu Tan, Ewin Tang, John WrightSODA 2026
- Quantum tomography using state-preparation unitariesJoran van Apeldoorn, Arjan Cornelissen, András Gilyén, Giacomo NanniciniSODA 2023 · 34 citations
- Optimal Tradeoffs for Estimating Pauli ObservablesSitan Chen, Weiyuan Gong, Qi YeFOCS 2024 · 13 citations
