FP64 is All You Need: Rethinking Failure Modes in Physics-Informed Neural Networks
Chenhui Xu, Dancheng Liu, Amir Nassereldine, Jinjun Xiong
Abstract
Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) often exhibit "failure modes" in which the PDE residual loss converges while the solution error stays large, a phenomenon traditionally blamed on local optima separated from the true solution by steep loss barriers. We challenge this understanding by demonstrate that the real culprit is insufficient arithmetic precision: with standard FP32, the L-BFGS optimizer prematurely satisfies its convergence test, freezing the network in a spurious failure phase. Simply upgrading to FP64 rescues optimization, enabling vanilla PINNs to solve PDEs without any failure modes. These results reframe PINN failure modes as precision-induced stalls rather than inescapable local minima and expose a three-stage training dynamic-un-converged, failure, success-whose boundaries shift with numerical precision. Our findings emphasize that rigorous arithmetic precision is the key to dependable PDE solving with neural networks. Our code is
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 90794642-6eba-45f2-a8b9-1fb36eb779c6Cited by top-tier papers4
- Physics-Informed Residual FlowsJephte Abijuru, Mayank Kumar Nagda, Phil Sidney Ostheimer, Sebastian Vollmer et al.ICML 2026
- Tensor Train Diffusion: Leveraging Low-Rank Structures for High-Dimensional Score-Based SamplingRobert Gruhlke, Julius Berner, David Sommer, Lorenz RichterICML 2026
- Heavy-tailed Physics-Informed Neural NetworksJephte Abijuru, Mayank Kumar Nagda, Jan Tauberschmidt, Phil Sidney Ostheimer et al.ICML 2026
- Overcoming PINNs Failure Modes In High Dimension With Low-Rank Fourier SumNatan Kaminsky, Daniel Freedman, Kira RadinskyICML 2026
Builds on14
- Characterizing possible failure modes in physics-informed neural networksAditi S. Krishnapriyan, Amir Gholami, Shandian Zhe, Robert M. Kirby et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 1,421 citations
- Linear Mode Connectivity and the Lottery Ticket HypothesisJonathan Frankle, Gintare Karolina Dziugaite, Daniel M. Roy, Michael CarbinICML 2020 · 750 citations
- Challenges in Training PINNs: A Loss Landscape PerspectivePratik Rathore, Weimu Lei, Zachary Frangella, Lu Lu et al.ICML 2024 · 137 citations
- Mitigating Propagation Failures in Physics-informed Neural Networks using Retain-Resample-Release (R3) SamplingArka Daw, Jie Bu, Sifan Wang, Paris Perdikaris et al.ICML 2023 · 95 citations
- Parameterized Physics-informed Neural Networks for Parameterized PDEsWoojin Cho, Minju Jo, Haksoo Lim, Kookjin Lee et al.ICML 2024 · 57 citations
Related papers
- Hypernetwork-based Meta-Learning for Low-Rank Physics-Informed Neural NetworksWoojin Cho, Kookjin Lee, Donsub Rim, Noseong ParkNeurIPS 2023 · 62 citations
- Accelerated Training of Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) using Meshless DiscretizationsRamansh Sharma, Varun ShankarNeurIPS 2022 · 81 citations
- An operator preconditioning perspective on training in physics-informed machine learningTim De Ryck, Florent Bonnet, Siddhartha Mishra, Emmanuel de BézenacICLR 2024 · 28 citations
- Competitive Physics Informed NetworksQi Zeng, Yash Kothari, Spencer H. Bryngelson, Florian SchäferICLR 2023 · 10 citations
- Taming the Loss Landscape of PINNs with Noisy Feynman–Kac Supervision: Operator Preconditioning and Non-Asymptotic Error BoundsNathanael Tepakbong, Hanyu HU, Chengyu Liu, Xiang ZHOUICML 2026
