Physics-Informed Residual Flows
Jephte Abijuru, Mayank Kumar Nagda, Phil Sidney Ostheimer, Sebastian Vollmer, Marius Kloft, Sophie Fellenz
Abstract
Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) embed physical laws into deep learning models. However, conventional PINNs often suffer from failure modes leading to inaccurate solutions. We trace these failure modes to two structural pathologies: gradient shattering, where gradients degrade with depth and provide little training signal, and flow mismatch, where training pushes predictions along trajectories that diverge from the PDE solution path. We introduce ResPINNs, which reformulate PINNs as residual flows, networks that iteratively refine their own predictions through explicit corrective steps, in the spirit of classical iterative solvers. Our analysis shows that this design mitigates both pathologies by keeping updates aligned with descent and by preserving informative gradients across depth. Extensive experiments on PDE benchmarks confirm that ResPINNs achieve higher accuracy with substantially fewer parameters than conventional architectures.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 01ff2aa9-1016-47e0-bfcd-df6934cedc42Builds on6
- Characterizing possible failure modes in physics-informed neural networksAditi S. Krishnapriyan, Amir Gholami, Shandian Zhe, Robert M. Kirby et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 1,421 citations
- Gradient Alignment in Physics-informed Neural Networks: A Second-Order Optimization PerspectiveSifan Wang, Ananyae Kumar Bhartari, Bowen Li, Paris PerdikarisNeurIPS 2025 · 100 citations
- FP64 is All You Need: Rethinking Failure Modes in Physics-Informed Neural NetworksChenhui Xu, Dancheng Liu, Amir Nassereldine, Jinjun XiongNeurIPS 2025 · 18 citations
- Continuous PDE Dynamics Forecasting with Implicit Neural RepresentationsYuan Yin, Matthieu Kirchmeyer, Jean-Yves Franceschi, Alain Rakotomamonjy et al.ICLR 2023 · 14 citations
- Sub-Sequential Physics-Informed Learning with State Space ModelChenhui Xu, Dancheng Liu, Yuting Hu, Jiajie Li et al.ICML 2025
Related papers
- Mitigating Propagation Failures in Physics-informed Neural Networks using Retain-Resample-Release (R3) SamplingArka Daw, Jie Bu, Sifan Wang, Paris Perdikaris et al.ICML 2023 · 95 citations
- Deep Coupling Learning for Solving PDEsLingshi MENG, Haosen Shi, Sinno Jialin PanICML 2026
- An operator preconditioning perspective on training in physics-informed machine learningTim De Ryck, Florent Bonnet, Siddhartha Mishra, Emmanuel de BézenacICLR 2024 · 28 citations
- MUSA-PINN: Multi-scale Weak-form Physics-Informed Neural Networks for Fluid Flow in Complex GeometriesWeizheng Zhang, Xunjie Xie, Hao Pan, Xiaowei Duan et al.ICML 2026
- Solver-in-the-Loop: Learning from Differentiable Physics to Interact with Iterative PDE-SolversKiwon Um, Robert Brand, Yun (Raymond) Fei, Philipp Holl et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 398 citations
