Deep Coupling Learning for Solving PDEs
Lingshi MENG, Haosen Shi, Sinno Jialin Pan
Abstract
Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) represent a significant advancement in computational methods for solving partial differential equations (PDEs). However, the adoption of deeper neural network architectures presents significant challenges, as they struggle to address differential-related complications that arise during the computation of derivatives over the input of PINNs. These complications extend beyond traditional vanishing and exploding gradients to include vanishing and exploding differentials, with both phenomena becoming more severe as networks grow deeper. By examining the computation graph of derivatives in deep neural networks, we identify key bottlenecks causing numerical instabilities in deep architectures. In response, we introduce a novel approach that utilizes Coupling Layers with carefully regulated spectral norms of Jacobian matrices to stabilize and facilitate deep PINN training, effectively addressing differential-related challenges and improving model stability. Our proposed architecture successfully mitigates the fundamental constraints of deeper PINNs while maximizing their capabilities through consistent differential propagation. Comprehensive evaluations show that our approach surpasses conventional shallow PINN methods and alternative deep PINN designs across a range of challenging problems.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Builds on4
- Fourier Features Let Networks Learn High Frequency Functions in Low Dimensional DomainsMatthew Tancik, Pratul P. Srinivasan, Ben Mildenhall, Sara Fridovich-Keil et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 4,036 citations
- Implicit Neural Representations with Periodic Activation FunctionsVincent Sitzmann, Julien N. P. Martel, Alexander W. Bergman, David B. Lindell et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 4,008 citations
- Characterizing possible failure modes in physics-informed neural networksAditi S. Krishnapriyan, Amir Gholami, Shandian Zhe, Robert M. Kirby et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 1,421 citations
- Is Physics Informed Loss Always Suitable for Training Physics Informed Neural Network?Chuwei Wang, Shanda Li, Di He, Liwei WangNeurIPS 2022 · 36 citations
Related papers
- Physics-Informed Residual FlowsJephte Abijuru, Mayank Kumar Nagda, Phil Sidney Ostheimer, Sebastian Vollmer et al.ICML 2026
- Separable Physics-Informed Neural NetworksJunwoo Cho, Seungtae Nam, Hyunmo Yang, Seok-Bae Yun et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 138 citations
- Mitigating Gradient Pathology in PINNs through Aligned ConstraintYichen Luo, Peiyu Zhu, Dongxiao Hu, Jia Wang et al.ICML 2026
- Graph-Coupled Oscillator NetworksT. Konstantin Rusch, Ben Chamberlain, James Rowbottom, Siddhartha Mishra et al.ICML 2022 · 156 citations
- Stable and Scalable Deep Predictive Coding Networks with Meta-Prediction ErrorsMyoung Hoon Ha, Hyunjun Kim, Yoondo Sung, Youngha Jo et al.ICLR 2026
