An operator preconditioning perspective on training in physics-informed machine learning
Tim De Ryck, Florent Bonnet, Siddhartha Mishra, Emmanuel de Bézenac
Abstract
In this paper, we investigate the behavior of gradient descent algorithms in physics-informed machine learning methods like PINNs, which minimize residuals connected to partial differential equations (PDEs). Our key result is that the difficulty in training these models is closely related to the conditioning of a specific differential operator. This operator, in turn, is associated to the Hermitian square of the differential operator of the underlying PDE. If this operator is ill-conditioned, it results in slow or infeasible training. Therefore, preconditioning this operator is crucial. We employ both rigorous mathematical analysis and empirical evaluations to investigate various strategies, explaining how they better condition this critical operator, and consequently improve training.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext b4970374-b729-4017-8ca6-4466749d3566Cited by top-tier papers10
- Challenges in Training PINNs: A Loss Landscape PerspectivePratik Rathore, Weimu Lei, Zachary Frangella, Lu Lu et al.ICML 2024 · 137 citations
- Parameterized Physics-informed Neural Networks for Parameterized PDEsWoojin Cho, Minju Jo, Haksoo Lim, Kookjin Lee et al.ICML 2024 · 57 citations
- Kronecker-Factored Approximate Curvature for Physics-Informed Neural NetworksFelix Dangel, Johannes Müller, Marius ZeinhoferNeurIPS 2024 · 31 citations
- How does PDE order affect the convergence of PINNs?Changhoon Song, Yesom Park, Myungjoo KangNeurIPS 2024 · 17 citations
- A Regularized Newton Method for Nonconvex Optimization with Global and Local Complexity GuaranteesYuhao Zhou, Jintao Xu, Bingrui Li, Chenglong Bao et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 8 citations
Builds on3
- Fourier Features Let Networks Learn High Frequency Functions in Low Dimensional DomainsMatthew Tancik, Pratul P. Srinivasan, Ben Mildenhall, Sara Fridovich-Keil et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 4,036 citations
- Characterizing possible failure modes in physics-informed neural networksAditi S. Krishnapriyan, Amir Gholami, Shandian Zhe, Robert M. Kirby et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 1,421 citations
- On the linearity of large non-linear models: when and why the tangent kernel is constantChaoyue Liu, Libin Zhu, Mikhail BelkinNeurIPS 2020 · 183 citations
Related papers
- Taming the Loss Landscape of PINNs with Noisy Feynman–Kac Supervision: Operator Preconditioning and Non-Asymptotic Error BoundsNathanael Tepakbong, Hanyu HU, Chengyu Liu, Xiang ZHOUICML 2026
- Gradient Descent Finds the Global Optima of Two-Layer Physics-Informed Neural NetworksYihang Gao, Yiqi Gu, Michael NgICML 2023 · 12 citations
- Implicit Stochastic Gradient Descent for Training Physics-Informed Neural NetworksYe Li, Songcan Chen, Sheng-Jun HuangAAAI 2023 · 5 citations
- Learning a Neural Solver for Parametric PDEs to Enhance Physics-Informed MethodsLise Le Boudec, Emmanuel de Bézenac, Louis Serrano, Ramon Daniel Regueiro-Espino et al.ICLR 2025
- Fast Convergence of Natural Gradient Descent for Over-parameterized Physics-Informed Neural NetworksXianliang Xu, Wang Kong, Jiaheng Mao, Zhongyi Huang et al.ICLR 2026 · 6 citations
