Heavy-tailed Physics-Informed Neural Networks
Jephte Abijuru, Mayank Kumar Nagda, Jan Tauberschmidt, Phil Sidney Ostheimer, Sebastian Vollmer, Stephan Mandt, Marius Kloft, Sophie Fellenz
Abstract
Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) enforce physical laws by minimizing partial differential equation (PDE) residuals and auxiliary constraints. Standard training relies on a mean-squared error (MSE) objective, which implicitly assumes independent Gaussian residuals with a fixed global variance. We show theoretically and empirically that residuals encountered during PINN training are heterogeneous and heavy-tailed, revealing a systematic mismatch with this assumption. As a consequence, a small number of large residuals can disproportionately dominate both the loss and gradient, leading to poorly balanced optimization dynamics. Motivated by this mismatch, we adopt a Student- residual model to explicitly capture heavy-tailed behavior. An equivalent hierarchical representation yields an expectation–maximization (EM) algorithm that alternates between estimating residual-dependent weights and optimizing network parameters via a weighted MSE objective, allowing existing PINN solvers to be reused in the M-step. The resulting training dynamics bound the influence of extreme residuals and admit almost sure convergence guarantees under standard stochastic optimization assumptions. Experiments across a diverse suite of challenging PDE benchmarks demonstrate consistently improved solution accuracy and robustness compared to standard PINN training.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 8a96fe97-bde9-49bc-8d83-8b75e9da4485Builds on8
- Characterizing possible failure modes in physics-informed neural networksAditi S. Krishnapriyan, Amir Gholami, Shandian Zhe, Robert M. Kirby et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 1,421 citations
- Gradient Alignment in Physics-informed Neural Networks: A Second-Order Optimization PerspectiveSifan Wang, Ananyae Kumar Bhartari, Bowen Li, Paris PerdikarisNeurIPS 2025 · 100 citations
- A Unified Convergence Theorem for Stochastic Optimization MethodsXiao Li, Andre MilzarekNeurIPS 2022 · 21 citations
- FP64 is All You Need: Rethinking Failure Modes in Physics-Informed Neural NetworksChenhui Xu, Dancheng Liu, Amir Nassereldine, Jinjun XiongNeurIPS 2025 · 18 citations
- Robust Gaussian Processes via Relevance PursuitSebastian Ament, Elizabeth Santorella, David Eriksson, Ben Letham et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 12 citations
Related papers
- Physics-Informed Residual FlowsJephte Abijuru, Mayank Kumar Nagda, Phil Sidney Ostheimer, Sebastian Vollmer et al.ICML 2026
- MultiAdam: Parameter-wise Scale-invariant Optimizer for Multiscale Training of Physics-informed Neural NetworksJiachen Yao, Chang Su, Zhongkai Hao, Songming Liu et al.ICML 2023 · 27 citations
- Mirror Flow Matching with Heavy-Tailed Priors for Generative Modeling on Convex DomainsYunrui Guan, Krishna Balasubramanian, Shiqian MaICLR 2026 · 10 citations
- MUSA-PINN: Multi-scale Weak-form Physics-Informed Neural Networks for Fluid Flow in Complex GeometriesWeizheng Zhang, Xunjie Xie, Hao Pan, Xiaowei Duan et al.ICML 2026
- PIG: Physics-Informed Gaussians as Adaptive Parametric Mesh RepresentationsNamgyu Kang, Jaemin Oh, Youngjoon Hong, Eunbyung ParkICLR 2025
