Robust Gaussian Processes via Relevance Pursuit
Sebastian Ament, Elizabeth Santorella, David Eriksson, Ben Letham, Maximilian Balandat, Eytan Bakshy
Abstract
Gaussian processes (GPs) are non-parametric probabilistic regression models that are popular due to their flexibility, data efficiency, and well-calibrated uncertainty estimates. However, standard GP models assume homoskedastic Gaussian noise, while many real-world applications are subject to non-Gaussian corruptions. Variants of GPs that are more robust to alternative noise models have been proposed, and entail significant trade-offs between accuracy and robustness, and between computational requirements and theoretical guarantees. In this work, we propose and study a GP model that achieves robustness against sparse outliers by inferring data-point-specific noise levels with a sequential selection procedure maximizing the log marginal likelihood that we refer to as relevance pursuit. We show, surprisingly, that the model can be parameterized such that the associated log marginal likelihood is strongly concave in the data-point-specific noise variances, a property rarely found in either robust regression objectives or GP marginal likelihoods. This in turn implies the weak submodularity of the corresponding subset selection problem, and thereby proves approximation guarantees for the proposed algorithm. We compare the model's performance relative to other approaches on diverse regression and Bayesian optimization tasks, including the challenging but common setting of sparse corruptions of the labels within or close to the function range.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers4
- Robust and Computation-Aware Gaussian ProcessesMarshal Arijona Sinaga, Julien Martinelli, Samuel KaskiNeurIPS 2025 · 1 citation
- Joint Model and Data Sparsification via the Marginal LikelihoodAlexander Timans, Thomas Moellenhoff, Christian Andersson Naesseth, Mohammad Emtiyaz Khan et al.ICML 2026
- Heavy-tailed Physics-Informed Neural NetworksJephte Abijuru, Mayank Kumar Nagda, Jan Tauberschmidt, Phil Sidney Ostheimer et al.ICML 2026
- Robust and Conjugate Spatio-Temporal Gaussian ProcessesWilliam Laplante, Matías Altamirano, Andrew B. Duncan, Jeremias Knoblauch et al.ICML 2025
Builds on9
- BoTorch: A Framework for Efficient Monte-Carlo Bayesian OptimizationMaximilian Balandat, Brian Karrer, Daniel R. Jiang, Samuel Daulton et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 686 citations
- Unexpected Improvements to Expected Improvement for Bayesian OptimizationSebastian Ament, Samuel Daulton, David Eriksson, Maximilian Balandat et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 280 citations
- Bayesian Model Selection, the Marginal Likelihood, and GeneralizationSanae Lotfi, Pavel Izmailov, Gregory W. Benton, Micah Goldblum et al.ICML 2022 · 83 citations
- Bayesian Active Learning with Fully Bayesian Gaussian ProcessesChristoffer Riis, Francisco Antunes, Frederik Boe Hüttel, Carlos Lima Azevedo et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 47 citations
- Self-Correcting Bayesian Optimization through Bayesian Active LearningCarl Hvarfner, Erik Hellsten, Frank Hutter, Luigi NardiNeurIPS 2023 · 29 citations
Related papers
- Robust and Conjugate Gaussian Process RegressionMatías Altamirano, François-Xavier Briol, Jeremias KnoblauchICML 2024 · 18 citations
- Modulating Surrogates for Bayesian OptimizationErik Bodin, Markus Kaiser, Ieva Kazlauskaite, Zhenwen Dai et al.ICML 2020 · 11 citations
- Empirical Gaussian ProcessesJihao Andreas Lin, Sebastian Ament, Louis Tiao, David Eriksson et al.ICML 2026
- Robust Bayesian Optimisation with Unbounded CorruptionsAbdelhamid Ezzerg, Ilija Bogunovic, Jeremias KnoblauchICML 2026 · 1 citation
- Sparse Bayesian Learning via Stepwise RegressionSebastian E. Ament, Carla P. GomesICML 2021 · 11 citations
