Linear Mode Connectivity and the Lottery Ticket Hypothesis
Jonathan Frankle, Gintare Karolina Dziugaite, Daniel M. Roy, Michael Carbin
Abstract
We study whether a neural network optimizes to the same, linearly connected minimum under different samples of SGD noise (e.g., random data order and augmentation). We find that standard vision models become stable to SGD noise in this way early in training. From then on, the outcome of optimization is determined to a linearly connected region. We use this technique to study iterative magnitude pruning (IMP), the procedure used by work on the lottery ticket hypothesis to identify subnetworks that could have trained in isolation to full accuracy. We find that these subnetworks only reach full accuracy when they are stable to SGD noise, which either occurs at initialization for small-scale settings (MNIST) or early in training for large-scale settings (ResNet-50 and Inception-v3 on ImageNet).
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers326
- FlashAttention: Fast and Memory-Efficient Exact Attention with IO-AwarenessTri Dao, Daniel Y. Fu, Stefano Ermon, Atri Rudra et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 5,493 citations
- Model soups: averaging weights of multiple fine-tuned models improves accuracy without increasing inference timeMitchell Wortsman, Gabriel Ilharco, Samir Yitzhak Gadre, Rebecca Roelofs et al.ICML 2022 · 1,464 citations
- TIES-Merging: Resolving Interference When Merging ModelsPrateek Yadav, Derek Tam, Leshem Choshen, Colin A. Raffel et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 999 citations
- Pruning neural networks without any data by iteratively conserving synaptic flowHidenori Tanaka, Daniel Kunin, Daniel L. K. Yamins, Surya GanguliNeurIPS 2020 · 884 citations
- Deep Learning on a Data Diet: Finding Important Examples Early in TrainingMansheej Paul, Surya Ganguli, Gintare Karolina DziugaiteNeurIPS 2021 · 806 citations
Builds on7
- Picking Winning Tickets Before Training by Preserving Gradient FlowChaoqi Wang, Guodong Zhang, Roger B. GrosseICLR 2020 · 743 citations
- Rigging the Lottery: Making All Tickets WinnersUtku Evci, Trevor Gale, Jacob Menick, Pablo Samuel Castro et al.ICML 2020 · 723 citations
- An Exponential Learning Rate Schedule for Deep LearningZhiyuan Li, Sanjeev AroraICLR 2020 · 267 citations
- The Early Phase of Neural Network TrainingJonathan Frankle, David J. Schwab, Ari S. MorcosICLR 2020 · 199 citations
- Winning the Lottery with Continuous SparsificationPedro Savarese, Hugo Silva, Michael MaireNeurIPS 2020 · 162 citations
Related papers
- Neural Network Pruning Denoises the Features and Makes Local Connectivity Emerge in Visual TasksFranco Pellegrini, Giulio BiroliICML 2022 · 10 citations
- Unmasking the Lottery Ticket Hypothesis: What's Encoded in a Winning Ticket's Mask?Mansheej Paul, Feng Chen, Brett W. Larsen, Jonathan Frankle et al.ICLR 2023 · 2 citations
- Analyzing Lottery Ticket Hypothesis from PAC-Bayesian Theory PerspectiveKeitaro Sakamoto, Issei SatoNeurIPS 2022 · 11 citations
- The Elastic Lottery Ticket HypothesisXiaohan Chen, Yu Cheng, Shuohang Wang, Zhe Gan et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 38 citations
- Rare Gems: Finding Lottery Tickets at InitializationKartik Sreenivasan, Jy-yong Sohn, Liu Yang, Matthew Grinde et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 52 citations
