The Early Phase of Neural Network Training
Jonathan Frankle, David J. Schwab, Ari S. Morcos
Abstract
Recent studies have shown that many important aspects of neural network learning take place within the very earliest iterations or epochs of training. For example, sparse, trainable sub-networks emerge (Frankle et al., 2019), gradient descent moves into a small subspace (Gur-Ari et al., 2018), and the network undergoes a critical period (Achille et al., 2019). Here we examine the changes that deep neural networks undergo during this early phase of training. We perform extensive measurements of the network state and its updates during these early iterations of training, and leverage the framework of Frankle et al. (2019) to quantitatively probe the weight distribution and its reliance on various aspects of the dataset. We find that, within this framework, deep networks are not robust to reinitializing with random weights while maintaining signs, and that weight distributions are highly non-independent even after only a few hundred iterations. Despite this, pre-training with blurred inputs or an auxiliary self-supervised task can approximate the changes in supervised networks, suggesting that these changes are label-agnostic, though labels significantly accelerate this process. Together, these results help to elucidate the network changes occurring during this pivotal initial period of learning.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 65243691-3193-4f47-9097-6b99cace750fCited by top-tier papers63
- Linear Mode Connectivity and the Lottery Ticket HypothesisJonathan Frankle, Gintare Karolina Dziugaite, Daniel M. Roy, Michael CarbinICML 2020 · 750 citations
- The Lottery Ticket Hypothesis for Pre-trained BERT NetworksTianlong Chen, Jonathan Frankle, Shiyu Chang, Sijia Liu et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 428 citations
- Memorization Without Overfitting: Analyzing the Training Dynamics of Large Language ModelsKushal Tirumala, Aram H. Markosyan, Luke Zettlemoyer, Armen AghajanyanNeurIPS 2022 · 304 citations
- Understanding the Role of Training Regimes in Continual LearningSeyed-Iman Mirzadeh, Mehrdad Farajtabar, Razvan Pascanu, Hassan GhasemzadehNeurIPS 2020 · 295 citations
- Drawing Early-Bird Tickets: Toward More Efficient Training of Deep NetworksHaoran You, Chaojian Li, Pengfei Xu, Yonggan Fu et al.ICLR 2020 · 282 citations
Related papers
- Lottery Tickets on a Data Diet: Finding Initializations with Sparse Trainable NetworksMansheej Paul, Brett W. Larsen, Surya Ganguli, Jonathan Frankle et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 27 citations
- The Butterfly Effect: Neural Network Training Trajectories Are Highly Sensitive to Initial ConditionsGül Sena Altintas, Devin Kwok, Colin Raffel, David RolnickICML 2025
- Deep learning versus kernel learning: an empirical study of loss landscape geometry and the time evolution of the Neural Tangent KernelStanislav Fort, Gintare Karolina Dziugaite, Mansheej Paul, Sepideh Kharaghani et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 255 citations
- What Do Neural Networks Learn When Trained With Random Labels?Hartmut Maennel, Ibrahim M. Alabdulmohsin, Ilya O. Tolstikhin, Robert J. N. Baldock et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 99 citations
- Critical Learning Periods for Multisensory Integration in Deep NetworksMichael Kleinman, Alessandro Achille, Stefano SoattoCVPR 2023
