Lottery Tickets on a Data Diet: Finding Initializations with Sparse Trainable Networks
Mansheej Paul, Brett W. Larsen, Surya Ganguli, Jonathan Frankle, Gintare Karolina Dziugaite
Abstract
A striking observation about iterative magnitude pruning (IMP; Frankle et al. 2020) is that after just a few hundred steps of dense training the method can find a sparse sub-network that can be trained to the same accuracy as the dense network. However, the same does not hold at step 0, i.e. random initialization. In this work, we seek to understand how this early phase of pre-training leads to a good initialization for IMP both through the lens of the data distribution and the loss landscape geometry. Empirically we observe that, holding the number of pre-training iterations constant, training on a small fraction of (randomly chosen) data suffices to obtain an equally good initialization for IMP. We additionally observe that by pre-training only on"easy"training data, we can decrease the number of steps necessary to find a good initialization for IMP compared to training on the full dataset or a randomly chosen subset. Finally, we identify novel properties of the loss landscape of dense networks that are predictive of IMP performance, showing in particular that more examples being linearly mode connected in the dense network correlates well with good initializations for IMP. Combined, these results provide new insight into the role played by the early phase training in IMP.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext fef89a2c-2d99-4c98-b2c0-65f3dbb3429aCited by top-tier papers7
- Masks, Signs, And Learning Rate RewindingAdvait Harshal Gadhikar, Rebekka BurkholzICLR 2024 · 15 citations
- Spanning Training Progress: Temporal Dual-Depth Scoring (TDDS) for Enhanced Dataset PruningXin Zhang, Jiawei Du, Yunsong Li, Weiying Xie et al.CVPR 2024 · 12 citations
- Evolution-aware VAriance (EVA) Coreset Selection for Medical Image ClassificationYuxin Hong, Xiao Zhang, Xin Zhang, Joey Tianyi ZhouACM MM 2024 · 4 citations
- Robust Active DistillationCenk Baykal, Khoa Trinh, Fotis Iliopoulos, Gaurav Menghani et al.ICLR 2023 · 3 citations
- Unmasking the Lottery Ticket Hypothesis: What's Encoded in a Winning Ticket's Mask?Mansheej Paul, Feng Chen, Brett W. Larsen, Jonathan Frankle et al.ICLR 2023 · 2 citations
Builds on12
- Deep Learning on a Data Diet: Finding Important Examples Early in TrainingMansheej Paul, Surya Ganguli, Gintare Karolina DziugaiteNeurIPS 2021 · 806 citations
- Linear Mode Connectivity and the Lottery Ticket HypothesisJonathan Frankle, Gintare Karolina Dziugaite, Daniel M. Roy, Michael CarbinICML 2020 · 750 citations
- Rigging the Lottery: Making All Tickets WinnersUtku Evci, Trevor Gale, Jacob Menick, Pablo Samuel Castro et al.ICML 2020 · 723 citations
- The Lottery Ticket Hypothesis for Pre-trained BERT NetworksTianlong Chen, Jonathan Frankle, Shiyu Chang, Sijia Liu et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 428 citations
- The Role of Permutation Invariance in Linear Mode Connectivity of Neural NetworksRahim Entezari, Hanie Sedghi, Olga Saukh, Behnam NeyshaburICLR 2022 · 301 citations
Related papers
- Neural Network Pruning Denoises the Features and Makes Local Connectivity Emerge in Visual TasksFranco Pellegrini, Giulio BiroliICML 2022 · 10 citations
- Rare Gems: Finding Lottery Tickets at InitializationKartik Sreenivasan, Jy-yong Sohn, Liu Yang, Matthew Grinde et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 52 citations
- When to Prune? A Policy towards Early Structural PruningMaying Shen, Pavlo Molchanov, Hongxu Yin, José M. ÁlvarezCVPR 2022 · 46 citations
- No Free Prune: Information-Theoretic Barriers to Pruning at InitializationTanishq Kumar, Kevin Luo, Mark SellkeICML 2024 · 9 citations
- How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love RetrainingMax Zimmer, Christoph Spiegel, Sebastian PokuttaICLR 2023
