Deep Learning on a Data Diet: Finding Important Examples Early in Training
Mansheej Paul, Surya Ganguli, Gintare Karolina Dziugaite
Abstract
Recent success in deep learning has partially been driven by training increasingly overparametrized networks on ever larger datasets. It is therefore natural to ask: how much of the data is superfluous, which examples are important for generalization, and how do we find them? In this work, we make the striking observation that, in standard vision datasets, simple scores averaged over several weight initializations can be used to identify important examples very early in training. We propose two such scores-the Gradient Normed (GraNd) and the Error L2-Norm (EL2N) scores-and demonstrate their efficacy on a range of architectures and datasets by pruning significant fractions of training data without sacrificing test accuracy. In fact, using EL2N scores calculated a few epochs into training, we can prune half of the CIFAR10 training set while slightly improving test accuracy. Furthermore, for a given dataset, EL2N scores from one architecture or hyperparameter configuration generalize to other configurations. Compared to recent work that prunes data by discarding examples that are rarely forgotten over the course of training, our scores use only local information early in training. We also use our scores to detect noisy examples and study training dynamics through the lens of important examples-we investigate how the data distribution shapes the loss surface and identify subspaces of the model's data representation that are relatively stable over training. * This work was carried out while the author was at ServiceNow. It was finalized at Google Brain. This version supersedes the published NeurIPS 2021 version of this work. Due to a bug in Flax[1] identified by Kirsch [2], the results for the GraNd score computed at initialization were miscalculated, and subsequent conclusions about pruning at initialization were erroneous. This version corrects these errors. 35th Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS 2021).
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 57160c8b-9a88-46b0-aaf2-7fc20daa8df6Cited by top-tier papers243
- Beyond neural scaling laws: beating power law scaling via data pruningBen Sorscher, Robert Geirhos, Shashank Shekhar, Surya Ganguli et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 720 citations
- LESS: Selecting Influential Data for Targeted Instruction TuningMengzhou Xia, Sadhika Malladi, Suchin Gururangan, Sanjeev Arora et al.ICML 2024 · 460 citations
- DoReMi: Optimizing Data Mixtures Speeds Up Language Model PretrainingSang Michael Xie, Hieu Pham, Xuanyi Dong, Nan Du et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 457 citations
- Data Selection for Language Models via Importance ResamplingSang Michael Xie, Shibani Santurkar, Tengyu Ma, Percy LiangNeurIPS 2023 · 383 citations
- Prioritized Training on Points that are Learnable, Worth Learning, and not yet LearntSören Mindermann, Jan Markus Brauner, Muhammed Razzak, Mrinank Sharma et al.ICML 2022 · 237 citations
Builds on12
- Estimating Training Data Influence by Tracing Gradient DescentGarima Pruthi, Frederick Liu, Satyen Kale, Mukund SundararajanNeurIPS 2020 · 784 citations
- Linear Mode Connectivity and the Lottery Ticket HypothesisJonathan Frankle, Gintare Karolina Dziugaite, Daniel M. Roy, Michael CarbinICML 2020 · 750 citations
- What Neural Networks Memorize and Why: Discovering the Long Tail via Influence EstimationVitaly Feldman, Chiyuan ZhangNeurIPS 2020 · 674 citations
- Coresets for Data-efficient Training of Machine Learning ModelsBaharan Mirzasoleiman, Jeff A. Bilmes, Jure LeskovecICML 2020 · 494 citations
- Selection via Proxy: Efficient Data Selection for Deep LearningCody Coleman, Christopher Yeh, Stephen Mussmann, Baharan Mirzasoleiman et al.ICLR 2020 · 462 citations
Related papers
- Lightweight Dataset Pruning without Full Training via Example Difficulty and Prediction UncertaintyYeseul Cho, Baekrok Shin, Changmin Kang, Chulhee YunICML 2025
- When to Prune? A Policy towards Early Structural PruningMaying Shen, Pavlo Molchanov, Hongxu Yin, José M. ÁlvarezCVPR 2022 · 46 citations
- Picking Winning Tickets Before Training by Preserving Gradient FlowChaoqi Wang, Guodong Zhang, Roger B. GrosseICLR 2020 · 743 citations
- A Gradient Flow Framework For Analyzing Network PruningEkdeep Singh Lubana, Robert P. DickICLR 2021 · 60 citations
- UNSEEN: Enhancing Dataset Pruning from a Generalization PerspectiveFurui Xu, Shaobo Wang, Jiajun Zhang, Chenghao Sun et al.AAAI 2026
