Winning the Lottery with Continuous Sparsification
Pedro Savarese, Hugo Silva, Michael Maire
Abstract
The search for efficient, sparse deep neural network models is most prominently performed by pruning: training a dense, overparameterized network and removing parameters, usually via following a manually-crafted heuristic. Additionally, the recent Lottery Ticket Hypothesis conjectures that, for a typically-sized neural network, it is possible to find small sub-networks which, when trained from scratch on a comparable budget, match the performance of the original dense counterpart. We revisit fundamental aspects of pruning algorithms, pointing out missing ingredients in previous approaches, and develop a method, Continuous Sparsification, which searches for sparse networks based on a novel approximation of an intractable 0 regularization. We compare against dominant heuristic-based methods on pruning as well as ticket search -finding sparse subnetworks that can be successfully re-trained from an early iterate. Empirical results show that we surpass the state-ofthe-art for both objectives, across models and datasets, including VGG trained on CIFAR-10 and ResNet-50 trained on ImageNet. In addition to setting a new standard for pruning, Continuous Sparsification also offers fast parallel ticket search, opening doors to new applications of the Lottery Ticket Hypothesis.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext eae1ca03-db44-4d5d-9640-377cf0698549Cited by top-tier papers59
- Linear Mode Connectivity and the Lottery Ticket HypothesisJonathan Frankle, Gintare Karolina Dziugaite, Daniel M. Roy, Michael CarbinICML 2020 · 750 citations
- Soft Threshold Weight Reparameterization for Learnable SparsityAditya Kusupati, Vivek Ramanujan, Raghav Somani, Mitchell Wortsman et al.ICML 2020 · 266 citations
- A Unified Lottery Ticket Hypothesis for Graph Neural NetworksTianlong Chen, Yongduo Sui, Xuxi Chen, Aston Zhang et al.ICML 2021 · 208 citations
- Do We Actually Need Dense Over-Parameterization? In-Time Over-Parameterization in Sparse TrainingShiwei Liu, Lu Yin, Decebal Constantin Mocanu, Mykola PechenizkiyICML 2021 · 146 citations
- Sparse Training via Boosting Pruning Plasticity with NeuroregenerationShiwei Liu, Tianlong Chen, Xiaohan Chen, Zahra Atashgahi et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 145 citations
Builds on2
- Linear Mode Connectivity and the Lottery Ticket HypothesisJonathan Frankle, Gintare Karolina Dziugaite, Daniel M. Roy, Michael CarbinICML 2020 · 750 citations
- Soft Threshold Weight Reparameterization for Learnable SparsityAditya Kusupati, Vivek Ramanujan, Raghav Somani, Mitchell Wortsman et al.ICML 2020 · 266 citations
Related papers
- Efficient Lottery Ticket Finding: Less Data is MoreZhenyu Zhang, Xuxi Chen, Tianlong Chen, Zhangyang WangICML 2021 · 58 citations
- Validating the Lottery Ticket Hypothesis with Inertial Manifold TheoryZeru Zhang, Jiayin Jin, Zijie Zhang, Yang Zhou et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 45 citations
- Plant 'n' Seek: Can You Find the Winning Ticket?Jonas Fischer, Rebekka BurkholzICLR 2022 · 21 citations
- Dual Lottery Ticket HypothesisYue Bai, Huan Wang, Zhiqiang Tao, Kunpeng Li et al.ICLR 2022 · 49 citations
- Lottery Ticket Preserves Weight Correlation: Is It Desirable or Not?Ning Liu, Geng Yuan, Zhengping Che, Xuan Shen et al.ICML 2021 · 34 citations
