Validating the Lottery Ticket Hypothesis with Inertial Manifold Theory
Zeru Zhang, Jiayin Jin, Zijie Zhang, Yang Zhou, Xin Zhao, Jiaxiang Ren, Ji Liu, Lingfei Wu, Ruoming Jin, Dejing Dou
Abstract
Despite achieving remarkable efficiency, traditional network pruning techniques often follow manually-crafted heuristics to generate pruned sparse networks. Such heuristic pruning strategies are hard to guarantee that the pruned networks achieve test accuracy comparable to the original dense ones. Recent works have empirically identified and verified the Lottery Ticket Hypothesis (LTH): a randomly-initialized dense neural network contains an extremely sparse subnetwork, which can be trained to achieve similar accuracy to the former. Due to the lack of theoretical evidence, they often need to run multiple rounds of expensive training and pruning over the original large networks to discover the sparse subnetworks with low accuracy loss. By leveraging dynamical systems theory and inertial manifold theory, this work theoretically verifies the validity of the LTH. We explore the possibility of theoretically lossless pruning as well as one-time pruning, compared with existing neural network pruning and LTH techniques. We reformulate the neural network optimization problem as a gradient dynamical system and reduce this high-dimensional system onto inertial manifolds to obtain a low-dimensional system regarding pruned subnetworks. We demonstrate the precondition and existence of pruned subnetworks and prune the original networks in terms of the gap in their spectrum that make the subnetworks have the smallest dimensions.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers18
- Fast Federated Machine Unlearning with Nonlinear Functional TheoryTianshi Che, Yang Zhou, Zijie Zhang, Lingjuan Lyu et al.ICML 2023 · 77 citations
- Accelerated Federated Learning with Decoupled Adaptive OptimizationJiayin Jin, Jiaxiang Ren, Yang Zhou, Lingjuan Lyu et al.ICML 2022 · 62 citations
- Prompt Certified Machine Unlearning with Randomized Gradient Smoothing and QuantizationZijie Zhang, Yang Zhou, Xin Zhao, Tianshi Che et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 56 citations
- An Operator Theoretic View On Pruning Deep Neural NetworksWilliam T. Redman, Maria Fonoberova, Ryan Mohr, Yannis G. Kevrekidis et al.ICLR 2022 · 21 citations
- PAC-Net: A Model Pruning Approach to Inductive Transfer LearningSanghoon Myung, In Huh, Wonik Jang, Jae Myung Choe et al.ICML 2022 · 18 citations
Builds on40
- Pruning neural networks without any data by iteratively conserving synaptic flowHidenori Tanaka, Daniel Kunin, Daniel L. K. Yamins, Surya GanguliNeurIPS 2020 · 884 citations
- Linear Mode Connectivity and the Lottery Ticket HypothesisJonathan Frankle, Gintare Karolina Dziugaite, Daniel M. Roy, Michael CarbinICML 2020 · 750 citations
- Picking Winning Tickets Before Training by Preserving Gradient FlowChaoqi Wang, Guodong Zhang, Roger B. GrosseICLR 2020 · 743 citations
- Rigging the Lottery: Making All Tickets WinnersUtku Evci, Trevor Gale, Jacob Menick, Pablo Samuel Castro et al.ICML 2020 · 723 citations
- Movement Pruning: Adaptive Sparsity by Fine-TuningVictor Sanh, Thomas Wolf, Alexander M. RushNeurIPS 2020 · 656 citations
Related papers
- Dual Lottery Ticket HypothesisYue Bai, Huan Wang, Zhiqiang Tao, Kunpeng Li et al.ICLR 2022 · 49 citations
- Winning the Lottery with Continuous SparsificationPedro Savarese, Hugo Silva, Michael MaireNeurIPS 2020 · 162 citations
- Lottery Ticket Preserves Weight Correlation: Is It Desirable or Not?Ning Liu, Geng Yuan, Zhengping Che, Xuan Shen et al.ICML 2021 · 34 citations
- Proving the Lottery Ticket Hypothesis for Convolutional Neural NetworksArthur da Cunha, Emanuele Natale, Laurent ViennotICLR 2022 · 31 citations
- The Elastic Lottery Ticket HypothesisXiaohan Chen, Yu Cheng, Shuohang Wang, Zhe Gan et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 38 citations
