An Operator Theoretic View On Pruning Deep Neural Networks
William T. Redman, Maria Fonoberova, Ryan Mohr, Yannis G. Kevrekidis, Igor Mezic
Abstract
The discovery of sparse subnetworks that are able to perform as well as full models has found broad applied and theoretical interest. While many pruning methods have been developed to this end, the naïve approach of removing parameters based on their magnitude has been found to be as robust as more complex, state-of-the-art algorithms. The lack of theory behind magnitude pruning's success, especially pre-convergence, and its relation to other pruning methods, such as gradient based pruning, are outstanding open questions in the field that are in need of being addressed. We make use of recent advances in dynamical systems theory, namely Koopman operator theory, to define a new class of theoretically motivated pruning algorithms. We show that these algorithms can be equivalent to magnitude and gradient based pruning, unifying these seemingly disparate methods, and find that they can be used to shed light on magnitude pruning's performance during the early part of training.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext bc7bc103-dfb3-4b91-8d97-9eedf97daafbCited by top-tier papers11
- Generative Modeling of Regular and Irregular Time Series Data via Koopman VAEsIlan Naiman, N. Benjamin Erichson, Pu Ren, Michael W. Mahoney et al.ICLR 2024 · 49 citations
- Identifying Equivalent Training DynamicsWilliam T. Redman, Juan M. Bello-Rivas, Maria Fonoberova, Ryan Mohr et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 15 citations
- QuACK: Accelerating Gradient-Based Quantum Optimization with Koopman Operator LearningDi Luo, Jiayu Shen, Rumen Dangovski, Marin SoljacicNeurIPS 2023 · 11 citations
- Koopman-based generalization bound: New aspect for full-rank weightsYuka Hashimoto, Sho Sonoda, Isao Ishikawa, Atsushi Nitanda et al.ICLR 2024 · 6 citations
- Enhancing Neural Training via a Correlated Dynamics ModelJonathan Brokman, Roy Betser, Rotem Turjeman, Tom Berkov et al.ICLR 2024 · 5 citations
Builds on5
- Linear Mode Connectivity and the Lottery Ticket HypothesisJonathan Frankle, Gintare Karolina Dziugaite, Daniel M. Roy, Michael CarbinICML 2020 · 750 citations
- Pruning Neural Networks at Initialization: Why Are We Missing the Mark?Jonathan Frankle, Gintare Karolina Dziugaite, Daniel M. Roy, Michael CarbinICLR 2021 · 261 citations
- A Signal Propagation Perspective for Pruning Neural Networks at InitializationNamhoon Lee, Thalaiyasingam Ajanthan, Stephen Gould, Philip H. S. TorrICLR 2020 · 174 citations
- Optimizing Neural Networks via Koopman Operator TheoryAkshunna S. Dogra, William T. RedmanNeurIPS 2020 · 65 citations
- Validating the Lottery Ticket Hypothesis with Inertial Manifold TheoryZeru Zhang, Jiayin Jin, Zijie Zhang, Yang Zhou et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 45 citations
Related papers
- Optimal Recurrent Network Topologies for Dynamical Systems ReconstructionChristoph Jürgen Hemmer, Manuel Brenner, Florian Hess, Daniel DurstewitzICML 2024 · 6 citations
- An Operator Theoretic Approach for Analyzing Sequence Neural NetworksIlan Naiman, Omri AzencotAAAI 2023 · 14 citations
- A Gradient Flow Framework For Analyzing Network PruningEkdeep Singh Lubana, Robert P. DickICLR 2021 · 60 citations
- What Makes a Good Prune? Maximal Unstructured Pruning for Maximal Cosine SimilarityGabryel Mason-Williams, Fredrik DahlqvistICLR 2024 · 20 citations
- Lottery Tickets on a Data Diet: Finding Initializations with Sparse Trainable NetworksMansheej Paul, Brett W. Larsen, Surya Ganguli, Jonathan Frankle et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 27 citations
