Competitive Physics Informed Networks
Qi Zeng, Yash Kothari, Spencer H. Bryngelson, Florian Schäfer
Abstract
Neural networks can be trained to solve partial differential equations (PDEs) by using the PDE residual as the loss function. This strategy is called "physics-informed neural networks" (PINNs), but it currently cannot produce high-accuracy solutions, typically attaining about relative error. We present an adversarial approach that overcomes this limitation, which we call competitive PINNs (CPINNs). CPINNs train a discriminator that is rewarded for predicting mistakes the PINN makes. The discriminator and PINN participate in a zero-sum game with the exact PDE solution as an optimal strategy. This approach avoids squaring the large condition numbers of PDE discretizations, which is the likely reason for failures of previous attempts to decrease PINN errors even on benign problems. Numerical experiments on a Poisson problem show that CPINNs achieve errors four orders of magnitude smaller than the best-performing PINN. We observe relative errors on the order of single-precision accuracy, consistently decreasing with each epoch. To the authors' knowledge, this is the first time this level of accuracy and convergence behavior has been achieved. Additional experiments on the nonlinear Schrödinger, Burgers', and Allen-Cahn equation show that the benefits of CPINNs are not limited to linear problems.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 2b1d6cb9-e6c8-4be1-b58c-587d1766881dCited by top-tier papers10
- Kronecker-Factored Approximate Curvature for Physics-Informed Neural NetworksFelix Dangel, Johannes Müller, Marius ZeinhoferNeurIPS 2024 · 31 citations
- Adversarial Adaptive Sampling: Unify PINN and Optimal Transport for the Approximation of PDEsKejun Tang, Jiayu Zhai, Xiaoliang Wan, Chao YangICLR 2024 · 21 citations
- Achieving High Accuracy with PINNs via Energy Natural Gradient DescentJohannes Müller, Marius ZeinhoferICML 2023 · 13 citations
- Flow Factorized Representation LearningYue Song, Andy Keller, Nicu Sebe, Max WellingNeurIPS 2023 · 12 citations
- Space and time continuous physics simulation from partial observationsSteeven Janny, Madiha Nadri, Julie Digne, Christian WolfICLR 2024 · 10 citations
Builds on4
- Characterizing possible failure modes in physics-informed neural networksAditi S. Krishnapriyan, Amir Gholami, Shandian Zhe, Robert M. Kirby et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 1,421 citations
- DC3: A learning method for optimization with hard constraintsPriya L. Donti, David Rolnick, J. Zico KolterICLR 2021 · 64 citations
- Implicit competitive regularization in GANsFlorian Schäfer, Hongkai Zheng, Animashree AnandkumarICML 2020 · 35 citations
- Amortized Finite Element Analysis for Fast PDE-Constrained OptimizationTianju Xue, Alex Beatson, Sigrid Adriaenssens, Ryan P. AdamsICML 2020 · 35 citations
Related papers
- Efficient Error Certification for Physics-Informed Neural NetworksFrancisco Eiras, Adel Bibi, Rudy Bunel, Krishnamurthy Dj Dvijotham et al.ICML 2024 · 7 citations
- Accelerated Training of Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) using Meshless DiscretizationsRamansh Sharma, Varun ShankarNeurIPS 2022 · 81 citations
- Physics-Informed Residual FlowsJephte Abijuru, Mayank Kumar Nagda, Phil Sidney Ostheimer, Sebastian Vollmer et al.ICML 2026
- Separable Physics-Informed Neural NetworksJunwoo Cho, Seungtae Nam, Hyunmo Yang, Seok-Bae Yun et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 138 citations
- An operator preconditioning perspective on training in physics-informed machine learningTim De Ryck, Florent Bonnet, Siddhartha Mishra, Emmanuel de BézenacICLR 2024 · 28 citations
