Efficient Error Certification for Physics-Informed Neural Networks
Francisco Eiras, Adel Bibi, Rudy Bunel, Krishnamurthy Dj Dvijotham, Philip Torr, M. Pawan Kumar
Abstract
Recent work provides promising evidence that Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINN) can efficiently solve partial differential equations (PDE). However, previous works have failed to provide guarantees on the worst-case residual error of a PINN across the spatio-temporal domain - a measure akin to the tolerance of numerical solvers - focusing instead on point-wise comparisons between their solution and the ones obtained by a solver on a set of inputs. In real-world applications, one cannot consider tests on a finite set of points to be sufficient grounds for deployment, as the performance could be substantially worse on a different set. To alleviate this issue, we establish guaranteed error-based conditions for PINNs over their continuous applicability domain. To verify the extent to which they hold, we introduce -CROWN: a general, efficient and scalable post-training framework to bound PINN residual errors. We demonstrate its effectiveness in obtaining tight certificates by applying it to two classically studied PINNs - Burgers' and Schrödinger's equations -, and two more challenging ones with real-world applications - the Allan-Cahn and Diffusion-Sorption equations.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext c0895dcc-9e9f-4a0b-be48-99dba88a170fCited by top-tier papers2
- PINNfluence: Interpreting PINNs through Influence FunctionsAleksander Krasowski, Jonas Naujoks, Moritz Weckbecker, Galip Yolcu et al.ICML 2026 · 1 citation
- Synthesizing Sound and Precise Abstract Transformers for Nonlinear Hyperbolic PDE SolversJacob Laurel, Ignacio Laguna, Jan HückelheimOOPSLA 2025 · 1 citation
Builds on9
- Characterizing possible failure modes in physics-informed neural networksAditi S. Krishnapriyan, Amir Gholami, Shandian Zhe, Robert M. Kirby et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 1,421 citations
- Automatic Perturbation Analysis for Scalable Certified Robustness and BeyondKaidi Xu, Zhouxing Shi, Huan Zhang, Yihan Wang et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 415 citations
- Fast and Complete: Enabling Complete Neural Network Verification with Rapid and Massively Parallel Incomplete VerifiersKaidi Xu, Huan Zhang, Shiqi Wang, Yihan Wang et al.ICLR 2021 · 250 citations
- General Cutting Planes for Bound-Propagation-Based Neural Network VerificationHuan Zhang, Shiqi Wang, Kaidi Xu, Linyi Li et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 154 citations
- Robustness Verification for TransformersZhouxing Shi, Huan Zhang, Kai-Wei Chang, Minlie Huang et al.ICLR 2020 · 131 citations
Related papers
- Competitive Physics Informed NetworksQi Zeng, Yash Kothari, Spencer H. Bryngelson, Florian SchäferICLR 2023 · 10 citations
- Generic bounds on the approximation error for physics-informed (and) operator learningTim De Ryck, Siddhartha MishraNeurIPS 2022 · 93 citations
- Machine Learning For Elliptic PDEs: Fast Rate Generalization Bound, Neural Scaling Law and Minimax OptimalityYiping Lu, Haoxuan Chen, Jianfeng Lu, Lexing Ying et al.ICLR 2022 · 54 citations
- Posterior Concentration of Bayesian Physics-Informed Neural Networks for Elliptic PDEsYuxuan Zhao, Yulong LuICML 2026
- RoPINN: Region Optimized Physics-Informed Neural NetworksHaixu Wu, Huakun Luo, Yuezhou Ma, Jianmin Wang et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 50 citations
