PINNfluence: Interpreting PINNs through Influence Functions
Aleksander Krasowski, Jonas Naujoks, Moritz Weckbecker, Galip Yolcu, Thomas Wiegand, Sebastian Lapuschkin, Wojciech Samek, René P. Klausen
Abstract
Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) have emerged as a powerful deep learning approach for solving partial differential equations (PDEs) in the physical sciences, yet their behavior remains largely opaque and is typically understood through failure mode analyses rather than explicit interpretability. To address this issue, we introduce PINNFLUENCE, a training data attribution framework for interpreting PINNs based on influence functions. By extending influence functions to composite physics-informed training objectives, we enable fine-grained attribution between predictions, loss components, and training data points. Through benchmark experiments across various PDEs, we demonstrate that influence patterns provide granular diagnostics that distinguish structural characteristics across well-trained and poorly-trained PINNs. PINN-FLUENCE thus opens a new avenue for understanding and improving the reliability of PINNs through the lens of their data.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 8239e2ed-fd7c-4d11-9f1d-1b5d8ff0bfd3Builds on21
- Characterizing possible failure modes in physics-informed neural networksAditi S. Krishnapriyan, Amir Gholami, Shandian Zhe, Robert M. Kirby et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 1,421 citations
- Sparse Autoencoders Find Highly Interpretable Features in Language ModelsRobert Huben, Hoagy Cunningham, Logan Riggs Smith, Aidan Ewart et al.ICLR 2024 · 1,072 citations
- Estimating Training Data Influence by Tracing Gradient DescentGarima Pruthi, Frederick Liu, Satyen Kale, Mukund SundararajanNeurIPS 2020 · 784 citations
- Interpretations are Useful: Penalizing Explanations to Align Neural Networks with Prior KnowledgeLaura Rieger, Chandan Singh, W. James Murdoch, Bin YuICML 2020 · 249 citations
- If Influence Functions are the Answer, Then What is the Question?Juhan Bae, Nathan Ng, Alston Lo, Marzyeh Ghassemi et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 185 citations
Related papers
- Generic bounds on the approximation error for physics-informed (and) operator learningTim De Ryck, Siddhartha MishraNeurIPS 2022 · 93 citations
- Physics-Informed Residual FlowsJephte Abijuru, Mayank Kumar Nagda, Phil Sidney Ostheimer, Sebastian Vollmer et al.ICML 2026
- MultiAdam: Parameter-wise Scale-invariant Optimizer for Multiscale Training of Physics-informed Neural NetworksJiachen Yao, Chang Su, Zhongkai Hao, Songming Liu et al.ICML 2023 · 27 citations
- Distributional Training Data Attribution: What do Influence Functions Sample?Bruno Kacper Mlodozeniec, Isaac Reid, Sam Power, David Krueger et al.NeurIPS 2025
- DPM: A Novel Training Method for Physics-Informed Neural Networks in ExtrapolationJungeun Kim, Kookjin Lee, Dongeun Lee, Sheo Yon Jhin et al.AAAI 2021 · 112 citations
