Machine Learning For Elliptic PDEs: Fast Rate Generalization Bound, Neural Scaling Law and Minimax Optimality
Yiping Lu, Haoxuan Chen, Jianfeng Lu, Lexing Ying, Jose H. Blanchet
Abstract
In this paper, we study the statistical limits of deep learning techniques for solving elliptic partial differential equations (PDEs) from random samples using the Deep Ritz Method (DRM) and Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs). To simplify the problem, we focus on a prototype elliptic PDE: the Schrödinger equation on a hypercube with zero Dirichlet boundary condition, which has wide application in the quantum-mechanical systems. We establish upper and lower bounds for both methods, which improves upon concurrently developed upper bounds for this problem via a fast rate generalization bound. We discover that the current Deep Ritz Methods is sub-optimal and propose a modified version of it. We also prove that PINN and the modified version of DRM can achieve minimax optimal bounds over Sobolev spaces. Empirically, following recent work which has shown that the deep model accuracy will improve with growing training sets according to a power law, we supply computational experiments to show a similar behavior of dimension dependent power law for deep PDE solvers.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 7f98b796-a2ce-49c3-84c8-97199d1be4a5Cited by top-tier papers13
- Is Physics Informed Loss Always Suitable for Training Physics Informed Neural Network?Chuwei Wang, Shanda Li, Di He, Liwei WangNeurIPS 2022 · 36 citations
- Sobolev Acceleration and Statistical Optimality for Learning Elliptic Equations via Gradient DescentYiping Lu, José H. Blanchet, Lexing YingNeurIPS 2022 · 15 citations
- Born-Infeld (BI) for AI: Energy-Conserving Descent (ECD) for OptimizationGiuseppe Bruno De Luca, Eva SilversteinICML 2022 · 14 citations
- UGrid: An Efficient-And-Rigorous Neural Multigrid Solver for Linear PDEsXi Han, Fei Hou, Hong QinICML 2024 · 8 citations
- Efficient Sampling of Stochastic Differential Equations with Positive Semi-Definite ModelsAnant Raj, Umut Simsekli, Alessandro RudiNeurIPS 2023 · 4 citations
Builds on8
- Fourier Neural Operator for Parametric Partial Differential EquationsZongyi Li, Nikola Borislavov Kovachki, Kamyar Azizzadenesheli, Burigede Liu et al.ICLR 2021 · 3,911 citations
- A Constructive Prediction of the Generalization Error Across ScalesJonathan S. Rosenfeld, Amir Rosenfeld, Yonatan Belinkov, Nir ShavitICLR 2020 · 265 citations
- A Function Space View of Bounded Norm Infinite Width ReLU Nets: The Multivariate CaseGreg Ongie, Rebecca Willett, Daniel Soudry, Nathan SrebroICLR 2020 · 172 citations
- Deep learning is adaptive to intrinsic dimensionality of model smoothness in anisotropic Besov spaceTaiji Suzuki, Atsushi NitandaNeurIPS 2021 · 76 citations
- Solving high-dimensional parabolic PDEs using the tensor train formatLorenz Richter, Leon Sallandt, Nikolas NüskenICML 2021 · 62 citations
Related papers
- Refined generalization analysis of the Deep Ritz Method and Physics-Informed Neural NetworksXianliang Xu, Ye Li, Zhongyi HuangICML 2025
- Deeper or Wider: A Perspective from Optimal Generalization Error with Sobolev LossYahong Yang, Juncai HeICML 2024 · 14 citations
- Achieving High Accuracy with PINNs via Energy Natural Gradient DescentJohannes Müller, Marius ZeinhoferICML 2023 · 13 citations
- Generic bounds on the approximation error for physics-informed (and) operator learningTim De Ryck, Siddhartha MishraNeurIPS 2022 · 93 citations
- HyPINO: Multi-Physics Neural Operators via HyperPINNs and the Method of Manufactured SolutionsRafael Bischof, Michal Piovarci, Michael A. Kraus, Siddhartha Mishra et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 8 citations
