Efficient Sampling of Stochastic Differential Equations with Positive Semi-Definite Models
Anant Raj, Umut Simsekli, Alessandro Rudi
Abstract
This paper deals with the problem of efficient sampling from a stochastic differential equation, given the drift function and the diffusion matrix. The proposed approach leverages a recent model for probabilities (the positive semi-definite -- PSD model) from which it is possible to obtain independent and identically distributed (i.i.d.) samples at precision with a cost that is where is the dimension of the model, the dimension of the space. The proposed approach consists in: first, computing the PSD model that satisfies the Fokker-Planck equation (or its fractional variant) associated with the SDE, up to error , and then sampling from the resulting PSD model. Assuming some regularity of the Fokker-Planck solution (i.e. -times differentiability plus some geometric condition on its zeros) We obtain an algorithm that: (a) in the preparatory phase obtains a PSD model with L2 distance from the solution of the equation, with a model of dimension where is the fractional power to the Laplacian, and total computational complexity of and then (b) for Fokker-Planck equation, it is able to produce i.i.d. samples with error in Wasserstein-1 distance, with a cost that is per sample. This means that, if the probability associated with the SDE is somewhat regular, i.e. , then the algorithm requires in the preparatory phase, and for each sample. Our results suggest that as the true solution gets smoother, we can circumvent the curse of dimensionality without requiring any sort of convexity.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext e8f528fb-8c3e-4145-8d19-59db130499ecBuilds on10
- Towards Theoretically Understanding Why Sgd Generalizes Better Than Adam in Deep LearningPan Zhou, Jiashi Feng, Chao Ma, Caiming Xiong et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 309 citations
- Generic bounds on the approximation error for physics-informed (and) operator learningTim De Ryck, Siddhartha MishraNeurIPS 2022 · 93 citations
- Hausdorff Dimension, Heavy Tails, and Generalization in Neural NetworksUmut Simsekli, Ozan Sener, George Deligiannidis, Murat A. ErdogduNeurIPS 2020 · 79 citations
- Non-parametric Models for Non-negative FunctionsUlysse Marteau-Ferey, Francis R. Bach, Alessandro RudiNeurIPS 2020 · 65 citations
- Machine Learning For Elliptic PDEs: Fast Rate Generalization Bound, Neural Scaling Law and Minimax OptimalityYiping Lu, Haoxuan Chen, Jianfeng Lu, Lexing Ying et al.ICLR 2022 · 54 citations
Related papers
- Faster Diffusion Sampling with Randomized Midpoints: Sequential and ParallelShivam Gupta, Linda Cai, Sitan ChenICLR 2025
- SA-Solver: Stochastic Adams Solver for Fast Sampling of Diffusion ModelsShuchen Xue, Mingyang Yi, Weijian Luo, Shifeng Zhang et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 91 citations
- Learning to Discretize Denoising Diffusion ODEsVinh Tong, Dung-Trung Hoang, Anji Liu, Guy Van den Broeck et al.ICLR 2025
- Penalized Langevin dynamics with vanishing penalty for smooth and log-concave targetsAvetik G. Karagulyan, Arnak S. DalalyanNeurIPS 2020 · 8 citations
- Primal Dual Interpretation of the Proximal Stochastic Gradient Langevin AlgorithmAdil Salim, Peter RichtárikNeurIPS 2020 · 53 citations
