Implicit competitive regularization in GANs
Florian Schäfer, Hongkai Zheng, Animashree Anandkumar
Abstract
To improve the stability of GAN training we need to understand why they can produce realistic samples. Presently, this is attributed to properties of the divergence obtained under an optimal discriminator. This argument has a fundamental flaw: If we do not impose regularity of the discriminator, it can exploit visually imperceptible errors of the generator to always achieve the maximal generator loss. In practice, gradient penalties are used to regularize the discriminator. However, this needs a metric on the space of images that captures visual similarity. Such a metric is not known, which explains the limited success of gradient penalties in stabilizing GANs. We argue that the performance of GANs is instead due to the implicit competitive regularization (ICR) arising from the simultaneous optimization of generator and discriminator. ICR promotes solutions that look real to the discriminator and thus leverages its inductive biases to generate realistic images. We show that opponent-aware modelling of generator and discriminator, as present in competitive gradient descent (CGD), can significantly strengthen ICR and thus stabilize GAN training without explicit regularization. In our experiments, we use an existing implementation of WGAN-GP and show that by training it with CGD we can improve the inception score (IS) on CIFAR10 for a wide range of scenarios, without any hyperparameter tuning. The highest IS is obtained by combining CGD with the WGAN-loss, without any explicit regularization.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 15510b4d-fe57-4796-8b01-0a0ba838ae8fCited by top-tier papers8
- Do GANs always have Nash equilibria?Farzan Farnia, Asuman E. OzdaglarICML 2020 · 93 citations
- Particle Cloud Generation with Message Passing Generative Adversarial NetworksRaghav Kansal, Javier M. Duarte, Hao Su, Breno Orzari et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 89 citations
- Train simultaneously, generalize better: Stability of gradient-based minimax learnersFarzan Farnia, Asuman E. OzdaglarICML 2021 · 56 citations
- Free Lunch for Domain Adversarial Training: Environment Label SmoothingYifan Zhang, Xue Wang, Jian Liang, Zhang Zhang et al.ICLR 2023 · 23 citations
- Self-Supervised GANs with Label AugmentationLiang Hou, Huawei Shen, Qi Cao, Xueqi ChengNeurIPS 2021 · 21 citations
Builds on2
- A Closer Look at the Optimization Landscapes of Generative Adversarial NetworksHugo Berard, Gauthier Gidel, Amjad Almahairi, Pascal Vincent et al.ICLR 2020 · 66 citations
- Coherent Gradients: An Approach to Understanding Generalization in Gradient Descent-based OptimizationSatrajit ChatterjeeICLR 2020 · 60 citations
Related papers
- Gradient Normalization for Generative Adversarial NetworksYi-Lun Wu, Hong-Han Shuai, Zhi Rui Tam, Hong-Yu ChiuICCV 2021 · 78 citations
- Adversarial Lipschitz RegularizationDávid TerjékICLR 2020 · 55 citations
- Consistency Regularization for Generative Adversarial NetworksHan Zhang, Zizhao Zhang, Augustus Odena, Honglak LeeICLR 2020 · 305 citations
- Adaptive Weighted Discriminator for Training Generative Adversarial NetworksVasily Zadorozhnyy, Qiang Cheng, Qiang YeCVPR 2021
- Bridging the Gap Between f-GANs and Wasserstein GANsJiaming Song, Stefano ErmonICML 2020 · 45 citations
