Characterizing Ethereum's Mining Power Decentralization at a Deeper Level
Liyi Zeng, Yang Chen, Shuo Chen, Xian Zhang, Zhongxin Guo, Wei Xu, Thomas Moscibroda
Abstract
For proof-of-work blockchains such as Ethereum, the mining power decentralization is an important discussion point in the community. Previous studies mostly focus on the aggregated power of the mining pools, neglecting the pool participants who are the source of the pools' power. In this paper, we present the first large-scale study of the pool participants in Ethereum's mining pools. Pool participants are not directly observable because they communicate with their pools via private channels. However, they leave "footprints" on chain as they use Ethereum accounts to anonymously receive rewards from mining pools. For this study, we combine several data sources to identify 62,358,646 pool reward transactions sent by 47 pools to their participants over Ethereum's entire near 5-year history. Our analyses about these transactions reveal interesting insights about three aspects of pool participants: the power decentralization at the participant level, their pool-switching behavior, and why they participate in pools. Our results provide a complementary and more balanced view about Ethereum's mining power decentralization at a deeper level.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 6b649387-54f8-4295-a030-593c8ab44d68Cited by top-tier papers2
- Uncle Maker: (Time)Stamping Out The Competition in EthereumAviv Yaish, Gilad Stern, Aviv ZoharCCS 2023 · 19 citations
- How Hard is Takeover in DPoS Blockchains? Understanding the Security of Coin-based Voting GovernanceChao Li, Balaji Palanisamy, Runhua Xu, Li Duan et al.CCS 2023 · 17 citations
Builds on12
- Making Smart Contracts SmarterLoi Luu, Duc-Hiep Chu, Hrishi Olickel, Prateek Saxena et al.CCS 2016 · 2,306 citations
- ZEUS: Analyzing Safety of Smart ContractsSukrit Kalra, Seep Goel, Mohan Dhawan, Subodh SharmaNDSS 2018 · 595 citations
- Arbitrum: Scalable, private smart contractsHarry A. Kalodner, Steven Goldfeder, Xiaoqi Chen, S. Matthew Weinberg et al.USENIX Security 2018 · 353 citations
- teEther: Gnawing at Ethereum to Automatically Exploit Smart ContractsJohannes Krupp, Christian RossowUSENIX Security 2018 · 345 citations
- Revive: Rebalancing Off-Blockchain Payment NetworksRami Khalil, Arthur GervaisCCS 2017 · 259 citations
Related papers
- SmartPool: Practical Decentralized Pooled MiningLoi Luu, Yaron Velner, Jason Teutsch, Prateek SaxenaUSENIX Security 2017 · 144 citations
- Deanonymizing Ethereum Users behind Third-Party RPC ServicesShan Wang, Ming Yang, Wenxuan Dai, Yu Liu et al.INFOCOM 2024 · 4 citations
- DETER: Denial of Ethereum Txpool sERvicesKai Li, Yibo Wang, Yuzhe TangCCS 2021 · 26 citations
- Deanonymizing Ethereum Validators: The P2P Network Has a Privacy IssueLioba Heimbach, Yann Vonlanthen, Juan Villacis, Lucianna Kiffer et al.USENIX Security 2025
- Under the Dark: A Systematical Study of Stealthy Mining Pools (Ab)use in the WildZhenrui Zhang, Geng Hong, Xiang Li, Zhuoqun Fu et al.CCS 2023 · 9 citations
