DETER: Denial of Ethereum Txpool sERvices
Kai Li, Yibo Wang, Yuzhe Tang
Abstract
On an Ethereum node, txpool (a.k.a. mempool) is a buer storing unconrmed transactions and controls what downstream services can see, such as mining and transaction propagation. This work presents the rst security study on Ethereum txpool designs. We discover awed transaction handling in all known Ethereum clients (e.g., Geth), and by exploiting it, design a series of low-cost denial-of-service attacks named DETER. A DETER attacker can disable a remote Ethereum node's txpool and deny the critical downstream services in mining, transaction propagation, Gas station, etc. By design, DETER attacks incur zero or low Ether cost. The attack can be amplied to cause global disruption to an Ethereum network by targeting centralized network services there (e.g., mining pools and transaction relay services). By evaluating local nodes, we verify the eectiveness and low cost of DETER attacks on all known Ethereum clients and in major testnets. We design non-trivial measurement methods against blackbox mainnet nodes and conduct light probes to conrm that popular mainnet services are exploitable under DETER attacks. We propose mitigation schemes that reduce a DETER attack's success rate down to zero while preserving the miners' revenue.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext a8af76d5-7b6b-4db8-a609-07e9b4932a53Cited by top-tier papers17
- Empirical Analysis of EIP-1559: Transaction Fees, Waiting Times, and Consensus SecurityYulin Liu, Yuxuan Lu, Kartik Nayak, Fan Zhang et al.CCS 2022 · 78 citations
- Speculative Denial-of-Service Attacks In EthereumAviv Yaish, Kaihua Qin, Liyi Zhou, Aviv Zohar et al.USENIX Security 2024 · 38 citations
- Nurgle: Exacerbating Resource Consumption in Blockchain State Storage via MPT ManipulationZheyuan He, Zihao Li, Ao Qiao, Xiapu Luo et al.S&P 2024 · 21 citations
- Understanding Ethereum Mempool Security under Asymmetric DoS by Symbolized Stateful FuzzingYibo Wang, Yuzhe Tang, Kai Li, Wanning Ding et al.USENIX Security 2024 · 9 citations
- Under the Dark: A Systematical Study of Stealthy Mining Pools (Ab)use in the WildZhenrui Zhang, Geng Hong, Xiang Li, Zhuoqun Fu et al.CCS 2023 · 9 citations
Builds on9
- Flash Boys 2.0: Frontrunning in Decentralized Exchanges, Miner Extractable Value, and Consensus InstabilityPhilip Daian, Steven Goldfeder, Tyler Kell, Yunqi Li et al.S&P 2020 · 607 citations
- Hijacking Bitcoin: Routing Attacks on CryptocurrenciesMaria Apostolaki, Aviv Zohar, Laurent VanbeverS&P 2017 · 473 citations
- Quantifying Blockchain Extractable Value: How dark is the forest?Kaihua Qin, Liyi Zhou, Arthur GervaisS&P 2022 · 336 citations
- Frontrunner Jones and the Raiders of the Dark Forest: An Empirical Study of Frontrunning on the Ethereum BlockchainChristof Ferreira Torres, Ramiro Camino, Radu StateUSENIX Security 2021 · 179 citations
- A Stealthier Partitioning Attack against Bitcoin Peer-to-Peer NetworkMuoi Tran, Inho Choi, Gi Jun Moon, Anh V. Vu et al.S&P 2020 · 126 citations
Related papers
- Asymmetric Mempool DoS Security: Formal Definitions and Provable Secure DesignsWanning Ding, Yuzhe Tang, Yibo WangS&P 2025
- Eclipse Attacks on Ethereum's Peer-to-Peer NetworkRuisheng Shi, Yuxuan Liang, Zijun Guo, Qin Wang et al.WWW 2026
- Partitioning Ethereum without Eclipsing ItHwanjo Heo, Seungwon Woo, Taeung Yoon, Min Suk Kang et al.NDSS 2023
- Evil Under the Sun: Understanding and Discovering Attacks on Ethereum Decentralized ApplicationsLiya Su, Xinyue Shen, Xiangyu Du, Xiaojing Liao et al.USENIX Security 2021 · 74 citations
- On the Effectiveness of Mempool-based Transaction AuditingJannik Albrecht, Ghassan KarameWWW 2026
