Hijacking Bitcoin: Routing Attacks on Cryptocurrencies
Maria Apostolaki, Aviv Zohar, Laurent Vanbever
Abstract
As the most successful cryptocurrency to date, Bitcoin constitutes a target of choice for attackers. While many attack vectors have already been uncovered, one important vector has been left out though: attacking the currency via the Internet routing infrastructure itself. Indeed, by manipulating routing advertisements (BGP hijacks) or by naturally intercepting traffic, Autonomous Systems (ASes) can intercept and manipulate a large fraction of Bitcoin traffic. This paper presents the first taxonomy of routing attacks and their impact on Bitcoin, considering both small-scale attacks, targeting individual nodes, and large-scale attacks, targeting the network as a whole. While challenging, we show that two key properties make routing attacks practical: (i) the efficiency of routing manipulation; and (ii) the significant centralization of Bitcoin in terms of mining and routing. Specifically, we find that any network attacker can hijack few (<100) BGP prefixes to isolate ∼50% of the mining power-even when considering that mining pools are heavily multi-homed. We also show that on-path network attackers can considerably slow down block propagation by interfering with few key Bitcoin messages. We demonstrate the feasibility of each attack against the deployed Bitcoin software. We also quantify their effectiveness on the current Bitcoin topology using data collected from a Bitcoin supernode combined with BGP routing data. The potential damage to Bitcoin is worrying. By isolating parts of the network or delaying block propagation, attackers can cause a significant amount of mining power to be wasted, leading to revenue losses and enabling a wide range of exploits such as double spending. To prevent such effects in practice, we provide both short and long-term countermeasures, some of which can be deployed immediately.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 9966154b-cef5-44c6-9161-4065db05dfd5Cited by top-tier papers42
- OHIE: Blockchain Scaling Made SimpleHaifeng Yu, Ivica Nikolic, Ruomu Hou, Prateek SaxenaS&P 2020 · 166 citations
- A Better Method to Analyze Blockchain ConsistencyLucianna Kiffer, Rajmohan Rajaraman, Abhi ShelatCCS 2018 · 149 citations
- A Stealthier Partitioning Attack against Bitcoin Peer-to-Peer NetworkMuoi Tran, Inho Choi, Gi Jun Moon, Anh V. Vu et al.S&P 2020 · 126 citations
- SABRE: Protecting Bitcoin against Routing AttacksMaria Apostolaki, Gian Marti, Jan Müller, Laurent VanbeverNDSS 2019 · 86 citations
- Bamboozling Certificate Authorities with BGPHenry Birge-Lee, Yixin Sun, Anne Edmundson, Jennifer Rexford et al.USENIX Security 2018 · 83 citations
Builds on1
Related papers
- Three Birds with One Stone: Efficient Partitioning Attacks on Interdependent Cryptocurrency NetworksMuhammad Saad, David MohaisenS&P 2023
- Revisiting Nakamoto Consensus in Asynchronous Networks: A Comprehensive Analysis of Bitcoin Safety and ChainQualityMuhammad Saad, Afsah Anwar, Srivatsan Ravi, David MohaisenCCS 2021 · 29 citations
- SyncAttack: Double-spending in Bitcoin Without Mining PowerMuhammad Saad, Songqing Chen, David MohaisenCCS 2021 · 37 citations
- Keep Your Friends Close, but Your Routeservers Closer: Insights into RPKI Validation in the InternetTomas Hlavacek, Haya Schulmann, Niklas Vogel, Michael WaidnerUSENIX Security 2023
- A System to Detect Forged-Origin BGP HijacksThomas Holterbach, Thomas Alfroy, Amreesh Phokeer, Alberto Dainotti et al.NSDI 2024 · 21 citations
