Three Birds with One Stone: Efficient Partitioning Attacks on Interdependent Cryptocurrency Networks
Muhammad Saad, David Mohaisen
Abstract
The biased distribution of cryptocurrency nodes across Autonomous Systems (ASes) increases the risk of spatial partitioning attacks, allowing an adversary to isolate nodes by hijacking AS prefixes. Prior works on spatial partitioning attacks have mainly focused on the Bitcoin network, showing that the prominent cryptocurrency network can be paralyzed by disrupting the physical topology through BGP hijacks.Despite the persisting threat of BGP hijacks, Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies have not been frequently targeted, likely due to their shielded overlay topology, which limits the exposure of physical network anomalies. In this paper, we present a new perspective by examining the security of cryptocurrency networks, considering shared network resources (network interdependence). We conduct measurements extending beyond the Bitcoin network and analyze commonalities in Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Ripple node hosting patterns. We observe that all three networks are highly centralized, predominantly sharing the common ASes. We also note that among the three cryptocurrencies, Ripple does not shield its overlay topology, which can be exploited to learn about the physical network anomalies. The observed network anomalies present practical attack strategies that can be launched to target all three cryptocurrencies simultaneously. 1 We supplement our analysis by surveying recent BGP attacks on high-profile ASes and recognizing a need for application-level countermeasures. We propose attack countermeasures that reduce the risk of spatial partitioning, notwithstanding the increasing centralization of nodes and network interdependence.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers5
- Phishing in Wonderland: Evaluating Learning-Based Ethereum Phishing Transaction Detection and PitfallsAhod Alghuried, David MohaisenNDSS 2026 · 4 citations
- Hamava: Fault-tolerant Reconfigurable Geo-Replication on Heterogeneous ClustersTeias Mane, Xiao Li, Mohammad Sadoghi, Mohsen LesaniICDE 2025 · 2 citations
- Eclipse Attacks on Monero's Peer-to-Peer NetworkRuisheng Shi, Zhiyuan Peng, Lina Lan, Yulian Ge et al.NDSS 2025
- Eclipse Attacks on Ethereum's Peer-to-Peer NetworkRuisheng Shi, Yuxuan Liang, Zijun Guo, Qin Wang et al.WWW 2026
- Are Unreachable Nodes Truly Safe? Fully Eclipsing Monero's P2P Network!Ruisheng Shi, Jiaqi Zeng, Lina Lan, Shihan Zhang et al.CCS 2026
Builds on4
- Hijacking Bitcoin: Routing Attacks on CryptocurrenciesMaria Apostolaki, Aviv Zohar, Laurent VanbeverS&P 2017 · 473 citations
- Be Selfish and Avoid Dilemmas: Fork After Withholding (FAW) Attacks on BitcoinYujin Kwon, Dohyun Kim, Yunmok Son, Eugene Y. Vasserman et al.CCS 2017 · 248 citations
- A Stealthier Partitioning Attack against Bitcoin Peer-to-Peer NetworkMuoi Tran, Inho Choi, Gi Jun Moon, Anh V. Vu et al.S&P 2020 · 126 citations
- SABRE: Protecting Bitcoin against Routing AttacksMaria Apostolaki, Gian Marti, Jan Müller, Laurent VanbeverNDSS 2019 · 86 citations
Related papers
- Routing Attacks on Cryptocurrency Mining PoolsMuoi Tran, Theo von Arx, Laurent VanbeverS&P 2024 · 7 citations
- On the Routing-Aware Peering against Network-Eclipse Attacks in BitcoinMuoi Tran, Akshaye Shenoi, Min Suk KangUSENIX Security 2021 · 28 citations
- Revisiting Nakamoto Consensus in Asynchronous Networks: A Comprehensive Analysis of Bitcoin Safety and ChainQualityMuhammad Saad, Afsah Anwar, Srivatsan Ravi, David MohaisenCCS 2021 · 29 citations
- Erlay: Efficient Transaction Relay for BitcoinGleb Naumenko, Gregory Maxwell, Pieter Wuille, Alexandra Fedorova et al.CCS 2019 · 1 citation
- Lay Down the Common Metrics: Evaluating Proof-of-Work Consensus Protocols' SecurityRen Zhang, Bart PreneelS&P 2019 · 113 citations
