Hamava: Fault-tolerant Reconfigurable Geo-Replication on Heterogeneous Clusters
Teias Mane, Xiao Li, Mohammad Sadoghi, Mohsen Lesani
Abstract
Fault-tolerant replicated database systems consume significantly less energy than the compute-intensive proof-of-work blockchain. Thus, they are promising technologies for the building blocks that assemble global financial infrastructure. To facilitate global scaling, clustered replication protocols are essential in orchestrating nodes into clusters based on proximity. However, existing approaches often assume a homogeneous and fixed model in which the number of nodes across clusters is the same and fixed, and often limited to a fail-stop fault model. This paper presents heterogeneous and reconfigurable clustered replication for the general environment with arbitrary failures. In particular, we present Hamava,a fault-tolerant reconfigurable geo-replication that allows dynamic membership: replicas are allowed to join and leave clusters. We formally state and prove the safety and liveness properties of the protocol. Furthermore, our replication protocol is consensus-agnostic, meaning each cluster can utilize any local replication mechanism. In our comprehensive evaluation, we instantiate our replication with both HotStuff and BFT-SMaRt. Experiments on geo-distributed deployments on Google Cloud demonstrates that members of clusters can be reconfigured without significantly affecting transaction processing, and that heterogeneity of clusters may significantly improve throughput.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext eb27fd4a-38ae-4f25-a16e-3c7f292b0d11Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on17
- On the Security and Performance of Proof of Work BlockchainsArthur Gervais, Ghassan O. Karame, Karl Wüst, Vasileios Glykantzis et al.CCS 2016 · 1,668 citations
- A Secure Sharding Protocol For Open BlockchainsLoi Luu, Viswesh Narayanan, Chaodong Zheng, Kunal Baweja et al.CCS 2016 · 1,392 citations
- OmniLedger: A Secure, Scale-Out, Decentralized Ledger via ShardingEleftherios Kokoris-Kogias, Philipp Jovanovic, Linus Gasser, Nicolas Gailly et al.S&P 2018 · 1,145 citations
- The Honey Badger of BFT ProtocolsAndrew Miller, Yu Xia, Kyle Croman, Elaine Shi et al.CCS 2016 · 974 citations
- Narwhal and Tusk: a DAG-based mempool and efficient BFT consensusGeorge Danezis, Lefteris Kokoris-Kogias, Alberto Sonnino, Alexander SpiegelmanEuroSys 2022 · 259 citations
Related papers
- ResilientDB: Global Scale Resilient Blockchain FabricSuyash Gupta, Sajjad Rahnama, Jelle Hellings, Mohammad SadoghiVLDB 2020 · 100 citations
- Tolerating Disasters with Hierarchical ConsensusWassim Yahyaoui, Joachim Bruneau-Queyreix, Marcus Völp, Jérémie DecouchantINFOCOM 2024 · 3 citations
- MassBFT: Fast and Scalable Geo-Distributed Byzantine Fault-Tolerant ConsensusZeshun Peng, Yanfeng Zhang, Tinghao Feng, Weixing Zhou et al.ICDE 2025 · 1 citation
- GeoLM: Performance-oriented Leader Management for Geo-Distributed Consensus ProtocolDuling Xu, Dafang Zhang, Tong Li, Yunpeng Chai et al.INFOCOM 2025 · 5 citations
- Samya: A Geo-Distributed Data System for High Contention Aggregate DataSujaya Maiyya, Ishtiyaque Ahmad, Divyakant Agrawal, Amr El AbbadiICDE 2021 · 1 citation
