USENIX Security2025Top-tier venue
Deanonymizing Ethereum Validators: The P2P Network Has a Privacy Issue
Lioba Heimbach, Yann Vonlanthen, Juan Villacis, Lucianna Kiffer, Roger Wattenhofer
Abstract
Many blockchain networks aim to preserve the anonymity of validators in the peer-to-peer (P2P) network, ensuring that no adversary can link a validator's identifier to the IP address of a peer due to associated privacy and security concerns. This work demonstrates that the Ethereum P2P network does not offer this anonymity. We present a methodology that enables any node in the network to identify validators hosted on connected peers and empirically verify the feasibility of our proposed method. Using data collected from four nodes over three days, we locate more than 15% of Ethereum validators in the P2P network. The insights gained from our deanonymization technique provide valuable information on the distribution of validators across peers, their geographic locations, and hosting organizations. We further discuss the implications and risks associated with the lack of anonymity in the P2P network and propose methods to help validators protect their privacy. The Ethereum Foundation has awarded us a bug bounty, acknowledging the impact of our results.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 720fe36d-a106-4b93-ae8a-9af80ae431b6Cited by top-tier papers3
- Beyond Anonymity Sets: A Security Model for Distributed Shuffling in Adversarial EnvironmentsAdrian Cinal, Oliwer Sobolewski, Gabriel Wechta, Filip ZagórskiCCS 2026
- Eclipse Attacks on Ethereum's Peer-to-Peer NetworkRuisheng Shi, Yuxuan Liang, Zijun Guo, Qin Wang et al.WWW 2026
- Are Unreachable Nodes Truly Safe? Fully Eclipsing Monero's P2P Network!Ruisheng Shi, Jiaqi Zeng, Lina Lan, Shihan Zhang et al.CCS 2026
Builds on9
- Flash Boys 2.0: Frontrunning in Decentralized Exchanges, Miner Extractable Value, and Consensus InstabilityPhilip Daian, Steven Goldfeder, Tyler Kell, Yunqi Li et al.S&P 2020 · 607 citations
- Hijacking Bitcoin: Routing Attacks on CryptocurrenciesMaria Apostolaki, Aviv Zohar, Laurent VanbeverS&P 2017 · 473 citations
- Quantifying Blockchain Extractable Value: How dark is the forest?Kaihua Qin, Liyi Zhou, Arthur GervaisS&P 2022 · 336 citations
- DeepCorr: Strong Flow Correlation Attacks on Tor Using Deep LearningMilad Nasr, Alireza Bahramali, Amir HoumansadrCCS 2018 · 187 citations
- A Stealthier Partitioning Attack against Bitcoin Peer-to-Peer NetworkMuoi Tran, Inho Choi, Gi Jun Moon, Anh V. Vu et al.S&P 2020 · 126 citations
Related papers
- Deanonymizing Ethereum Users behind Third-Party RPC ServicesShan Wang, Ming Yang, Wenxuan Dai, Yu Liu et al.INFOCOM 2024 · 4 citations
- Time Tells All: Deanonymization of Blockchain RPC Users with Zero Transaction FeeShan Wang, Ming Yang, Yu Liu, Yue Zhang et al.CCS 2025
- DEthna: Accurate Ethereum Network Topology Discovery with Marked TransactionsChonghe Zhao, Yipeng Zhou, Shengli Zhang, Taotao Wang et al.INFOCOM 2024 · 7 citations
- On the Anonymity of Peer-To-Peer Network Anonymity Schemes Used by CryptocurrenciesPiyush Kumar Sharma, Devashish Gosain, Claudia DíazNDSS 2023
- Characterizing Ethereum's Mining Power Decentralization at a Deeper LevelLiyi Zeng, Yang Chen, Shuo Chen, Xian Zhang et al.INFOCOM 2021 · 14 citations
