Revive: Rebalancing Off-Blockchain Payment Networks
Rami Khalil, Arthur Gervais
Abstract
Scaling the transaction throughput of decentralized blockchain ledgers such as Bitcoin and Ethereum has been an ongoing challenge. Two-party duplex payment channels have been designed and used as building blocks to construct linked payment networks, which allow atomic and trust-free payments between parties without exhausting the resources of the blockchain. Once a payment channel, however, is depleted (e.g., because transactions were mostly unidirectional) the channel would need to be closed and re-funded to allow for new transactions. Users are envisioned to entertain multiple payment channels with di erent entities, and as such, instead of refunding a channel (which incurs costly on-chain transactions), a user should be able to leverage his existing channels to rebalance a poorly funded channel. To the best of our knowledge, we present the rst solution that allows an arbitrary set of users in a payment channel network to securely rebalance their channels, according to the preferences of the channel owners. Except in the case of disputes (similar to conventional payment channels), our solution does not require onchain transactions and therefore increases the scalability of existing blockchains. In our security analysis, we show that an honest participant cannot lose any of its funds while rebalancing. We nally provide a proof of concept implementation and evaluation for the Ethereum network.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext cc515199-437b-47d3-8c5f-04a684dac77aCited by top-tier papers15
- Anonymous Multi-Hop Locks for Blockchain Scalability and InteroperabilityGiulio Malavolta, Pedro Moreno-Sanchez, Clara Schneidewind, Aniket Kate et al.NDSS 2019 · 305 citations
- General State Channel NetworksStefan Dziembowski, Sebastian Faust, Kristina HostákováCCS 2018 · 249 citations
- HyperService: Interoperability and Programmability Across Heterogeneous BlockchainsZhuotao Liu, Yangxi Xiang, Jian Shi, Peng Gao et al.CCS 2019 · 128 citations
- Atomic Multi-Channel Updates with Constant Collateral in Bitcoin-Compatible Payment-Channel NetworksChristoph Egger, Pedro Moreno-Sanchez, Matteo MaffeiCCS 2019 · 108 citations
- MAD-HTLC: Because HTLC is Crazy-Cheap to AttackItay Tsabary, Matan Yechieli, Alex Manuskin, Ittay EyalS&P 2021 · 87 citations
Builds on4
- Making Smart Contracts SmarterLoi Luu, Duc-Hiep Chu, Hrishi Olickel, Prateek Saxena et al.CCS 2016 · 2,306 citations
- On the Security and Performance of Proof of Work BlockchainsArthur Gervais, Ghassan O. Karame, Karl Wüst, Vasileios Glykantzis et al.CCS 2016 · 1,668 citations
- Enhancing Bitcoin Security and Performance with Strong Consistency via Collective SigningEleftherios Kokoris-Kogias, Philipp Jovanovic, Nicolas Gailly, Ismail Khoffi et al.USENIX Security 2016 · 769 citations
- Bolt: Anonymous Payment Channels for Decentralized CurrenciesMatthew Green, Ian MiersCCS 2017 · 281 citations
Related papers
- Shaduf: Non-Cycle Payment Channel RebalancingZhonghui Ge, Yi Zhang, Yu Long, Dawu GuNDSS 2022
- Payment Channel Networks: Single-Hop Scheduling for Throughput MaximizationNikolaos Papadis, Leandros TassiulasINFOCOM 2022 · 23 citations
- Horcrux: Synthesize, Split, Shift and Stay Alive; Preventing Channel Depletion via Universal and Enhanced Multi-hop PaymentsAnqi Tian, Peifang Ni, Yingzi Gao, Jing XuNDSS 2025
- Utility-aware Payment Channel Network RebalanceWangze Ni, Pengze Chen, Lei Chen, Peng Cheng et al.VLDB 2024 · 3 citations
- Secure Balance Planning of Off-blockchain Payment Channel NetworksPeng Li, Toshiaki Miyazaki, Wanlei ZhouINFOCOM 2020 · 48 citations
