USENIX Security2018Top-tier venue
teEther: Gnawing at Ethereum to Automatically Exploit Smart Contracts
Johannes Krupp, Christian Rossow
Abstract
Cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin not only provide a decentralized currency, but also provide a programmatic way to process transactions. Ethereum, the second largest cryptocurrency next to Bitcoin, is the first to provide a Turing-complete language to specify transaction processing, thereby enabling so-called smart contracts. This provides an opportune setting for attackers, as security vulnerabilities are tightly intertwined with financial gain. In this paper, we consider the problem of automatic vulnerability identification and exploit generation for smart contracts. We develop a generic definition of vulnerable contracts and use this to build TEETHER, a tool that allows creating an exploit for a contract given only its binary bytecode. We perform a large-scale analysis of all 38,757 unique Ethereum contracts, 815 out of which our tool finds working exploits for-completely automated.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 24602a3a-8474-435c-a02f-eb23fac730d3Cited by top-tier papers74
- Empirical review of automated analysis tools on 47, 587 Ethereum smart contractsThomas Durieux, João F. Ferreira, Rui Abreu, Pedro CruzICSE 2020 · 373 citations
- Sereum: Protecting Existing Smart Contracts Against Re-Entrancy AttacksMichael Rodler, Wenting Li, Ghassan O. Karame, Lucas DaviNDSS 2019 · 298 citations
- Learning to Fuzz from Symbolic Execution with Application to Smart ContractsJingxuan He, Mislav Balunovic, Nodar Ambroladze, Petar Tsankov et al.CCS 2019 · 288 citations
- sFuzz: an efficient adaptive fuzzer for solidity smart contractsTai D. Nguyen, Long H. Pham, Jun Sun, Yun Lin et al.ICSE 2020 · 260 citations
- The Art of The Scam: Demystifying Honeypots in Ethereum Smart ContractsChristof Ferreira Torres, Mathis Steichen, Radu StateUSENIX Security 2019 · 239 citations
Builds on3
- Making Smart Contracts SmarterLoi Luu, Duc-Hiep Chu, Hrishi Olickel, Prateek Saxena et al.CCS 2016 · 2,306 citations
- Enter the Hydra: Towards Principled Bug Bounties and Exploit-Resistant Smart ContractsLorenz Breidenbach, Philip Daian, Florian Tramèr, Ari JuelsUSENIX Security 2018 · 122 citations
- Erays: Reverse Engineering Ethereum's Opaque Smart ContractsYi Zhou, Deepak Kumar, Surya Bakshi, Joshua Mason et al.USENIX Security 2018 · 107 citations
Related papers
- Summary-Based Symbolic Evaluation for Smart ContractsYu Feng, Emina Torlak, Rastislav BodíkASE 2020 · 15 citations
- Semantic Understanding of Smart Contracts: Executable Operational Semantics of SolidityJiao Jiao, Shuanglong Kan, Shang-Wei Lin, David Sanán et al.S&P 2020 · 82 citations
- Automated Inference on Financial Security of Ethereum Smart ContractsWansen Wang, Wenchao Huang, Zhaoyi Meng, Yan Xiong et al.USENIX Security 2023
- TXSPECTOR: Uncovering Attacks in Ethereum from TransactionsMengya Zhang, Xiaokuan Zhang, Yinqian Zhang, Zhiqiang LinUSENIX Security 2020
- ETHBMC: A Bounded Model Checker for Smart ContractsJoel Frank, Cornelius Aschermann, Thorsten HolzUSENIX Security 2020
