USENIX Security2023Top-tier venue
Automated Inference on Financial Security of Ethereum Smart Contracts
Wansen Wang, Wenchao Huang, Zhaoyi Meng, Yan Xiong, Fuyou Miao, Xianjin Fang, Caichang Tu, Renjie Ji
Abstract
Nowadays millions of Ethereum smart contracts are created per year and become attractive targets for financially motivated attackers. However, existing analyzers are not sufficient to analyze the financial security of a large number of contracts precisely. In this paper, we propose and implement FASVERIF, an automated inference system for fine-grained analysis of smart contracts. FASVERIF automatically generates models to be verified against security properties of smart contracts. Besides, different from existing approaches of formal verifications, our inference system also automatically generates the security properties. Specifically, we propose two types of security properties, invariant properties and equivalence properties, which can be used to detect various types of finance-related vulnerabilities and can be automatically generated based on our statistical analysis. As a result, FASVERIF can automatically process source code of smart contracts, and uses formal methods whenever possible to simultaneously maximize its accuracy. We also prove the soundness of verifying our properties using our translated model based on a custom semantics of Solidity. We evaluate FASVERIF on a vulnerabilities dataset of 549 contracts by comparing it with other automatic tools. Our evaluation shows that FASVERIF greatly outperforms the representative tools using different technologies, with respect to accuracy and coverage of types of vulnerabilities. We also evaluate FASVERIF on a real-world dataset of 1700 contracts, and find 13 contracts with bugs that can still be leveraged by adversaries online.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers2
- Phishing in Wonderland: Evaluating Learning-Based Ethereum Phishing Transaction Detection and PitfallsAhod Alghuried, David MohaisenNDSS 2026 · 4 citations
- When HTTP 402 Meets the Blockchain: Risks on Emerging x402 PaymentsQinying Wang, Yong Yang, Yuan Chen, Shouling Ji et al.USENIX Security 2026
Builds on15
- Making Smart Contracts SmarterLoi Luu, Duc-Hiep Chu, Hrishi Olickel, Prateek Saxena et al.CCS 2016 · 2,306 citations
- Securify: Practical Security Analysis of Smart ContractsPetar Tsankov, Andrei Marian Dan, Dana Drachsler-Cohen, Arthur Gervais et al.CCS 2018 · 1,108 citations
- ZEUS: Analyzing Safety of Smart ContractsSukrit Kalra, Seep Goel, Mohan Dhawan, Subodh SharmaNDSS 2018 · 595 citations
- Empirical review of automated analysis tools on 47, 587 Ethereum smart contractsThomas Durieux, João F. Ferreira, Rui Abreu, Pedro CruzICSE 2020 · 373 citations
- teEther: Gnawing at Ethereum to Automatically Exploit Smart ContractsJohannes Krupp, Christian RossowUSENIX Security 2018 · 345 citations
Related papers
- VERISMART: A Highly Precise Safety Verifier for Ethereum Smart ContractsSunbeom So, Myungho Lee, Jisu Park, Heejo Lee et al.S&P 2020 · 133 citations
- Abusing the Ethereum Smart Contract Verification Services for Fun and ProfitPengxiang Ma, Ningyu He, Yuhua Huang, Haoyu Wang et al.NDSS 2024
- SolType: refinement types for arithmetic overflow in solidityBryan Tan, Benjamin Mariano, Shuvendu K. Lahiri, Isil Dillig et al.POPL 2022 · 29 citations
- All Your Tokens are Belong to Us: Demystifying Address Verification Vulnerabilities in Solidity Smart ContractsTianle Sun, Ningyu He, Jiang Xiao, Yinliang Yue et al.USENIX Security 2024 · 11 citations
- VerX: Safety Verification of Smart ContractsAnton Permenev, Dimitar Dimitrov, Petar Tsankov, Dana Drachsler-Cohen et al.S&P 2020 · 251 citations
