Mechanistic Permutability: Match Features Across Layers
Nikita Balagansky, Ian Maksimov, Daniil Gavrilov
Abstract
Understanding how features evolve across layers in deep neural networks is a fundamental challenge in mechanistic interpretability, particularly due to polysemanticity and feature superposition. While Sparse Autoencoders (SAEs) have been used to extract interpretable features from individual layers, aligning these features across layers has remained an open problem. In this paper, we introduce SAE Match, a novel, data-free method for aligning SAE features across different layers of a neural network. Our approach involves matching features by minimizing the mean squared error between the folded parameters of SAEs, a technique that incorporates activation thresholds into the encoder and decoder weights to account for differences in feature scales. Through extensive experiments on the Gemma 2 language model, we demonstrate that our method effectively captures feature evolution across layers, improving feature matching quality. We also show that features persist over several layers and that our approach can approximate hidden states across layers. Our work advances the understanding of feature dynamics in neural networks and provides a new tool for mechanistic interpretability studies.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext fbdc35cc-80e2-47d3-b1a8-5a6f67e280a2Cited by top-tier papers7
- Sparse Autoencoders Trained on the Same Data Learn Different FeaturesGonçalo Paulo, Nora BelroseICLR 2026 · 96 citations
- I Have Covered All the Bases Here: Interpreting Reasoning Features in Large Language Models via Sparse AutoencodersAndrey V. Galichin, Alexey Dontsov, Polina Druzhinina, Anton Razzhigaev et al.AAAI 2026 · 31 citations
- DePass: Unified Feature Attributing by Simple Decomposed Forward PassXiangyu Hong, Che Jiang, Kai Tian, Biqing Qi et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 4 citations
- Interpreting vision transformers via residual replacement modelJinyeong Kim, Junhyeok Kim, Yumin Shim, Joohyeok Kim et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 4 citations
- Interpretation Meets Safety: A Survey on Interpretation Methods and Tools for Improving LLM SafetySeongmin Lee, Aeree Cho, Grace C. Kim, Shengyun Peng et al.EMNLP 2025 · 1 citation
Builds on1
Related papers
- From Flat to Hierarchical: Extracting Sparse Representations with Matching PursuitValérie Costa, Thomas Fel, Ekdeep Singh Lubana, Bahareh Tolooshams et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 54 citations
- Analyze Feature Flow to Enhance Interpretation and Steering in Language ModelsDaniil Laptev, Nikita Balagansky, Yaroslav Aksenov, Daniil GavrilovICML 2025
- Interpreting Genomic Language Models using Sparse AutoencodersAkira Nair, Jaehyun Joo, Jonghyun Lee, Lina Takemaru et al.ICML 2026
- Revising and Falsifying Sparse Autoencoder Feature ExplanationsGeorge Ma, Samuel Pfrommer, Somayeh SojoudiNeurIPS 2025 · 7 citations
- On the Limits of Sparse Autoencoders: A Theoretical Framework and Reweighted RemedyJingyi Cui, Qi Zhang, Yifei Wang, Yisen WangICLR 2026 · 16 citations
