Interpreting Genomic Language Models using Sparse Autoencoders
Akira Nair, Jaehyun Joo, Jonghyun Lee, Lina Takemaru, Yidi Huang, Manu Shivakumar, Matthew Lee, Jaesik Kim, Sokratis Apostolidis, Dokyoon Kim
Abstract
Genomic language models (gLMs) achieve strong performance across genomic prediction tasks, but their internal biological representations remain poorly understood. Sparse autoencoders (SAEs) have emerged as an interpretability tool in vision and natural language models, yet their applicability to gLMs remains unexplored. We present a systematic study of SAE-based interpretability for gLMs, introducing a diverse benchmark of human genomic annotations and a suite of genome-tailored interpretability metrics. Using Evo2 as a primary case study, we show that SAE features, particularly those from intermediate layers, are more interpretable than raw model embeddings across 42/55 (76%) of our genomic concept evaluations, with 26 of them having an F1 score greater than 0.7. We further find that interpretability depends on SAE training data properties such as evolutionary proximity and context length. Finally, to organize semantically related genomic concepts learned by an SAE, we develop a graph-based representation method that outperforms the baseline approach of using SAE model weights. We demonstrate how our framework can extend SAEs as a powerful approach for not only better understanding gLMs but also for adopting them in disease-driven genomic explorations.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Builds on5
- Sparse Autoencoders Find Highly Interpretable Features in Language ModelsRobert Huben, Hoagy Cunningham, Logan Riggs Smith, Aidan Ewart et al.ICLR 2024 · 1,072 citations
- A is for Absorption: Studying Feature Splitting and Absorption in Sparse AutoencodersDavid Chanin, James Wilken-Smith, Tomás Dulka, Hardik Bhatnagar et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 168 citations
- Sparse Autoencoders Learn Monosemantic Features in Vision-Language ModelsMateusz Pach, Shyamgopal Karthik, Quentin Bouniot, Serge J. Belongie et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 79 citations
- Scaling and evaluating sparse autoencodersLeo Gao, Tom Dupré la Tour, Henk Tillman, Gabriel Goh et al.ICLR 2025 · 10 citations
- SAEBench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Sparse Autoencoders in Language Model InterpretabilityAdam Karvonen, Can Rager, Johnny Lin, Curt Tigges et al.ICML 2025
Related papers
- ConceptViz: A Visual Analytics Approach for Exploring Concepts in Large Language ModelsHaoxuan Li, Zhen Wen, Qiqi Jiang, Chenxiao Li et al.IEEE VIS 2025 · 3 citations
- ProtSAE: Disentangling and Interpreting Protein Language Models via Semantically-Guided Sparse AutoencodersXiangyu Liu, Haodi Lei, Yi Liu, Yang Liu et al.AAAI 2026 · 2 citations
- Evaluating SAE interpretability without generating explanationsGonçalo Paulo, Nora BelroseICLR 2026 · 2 citations
- Sparse Autoencoder Features for Classifications and TransferabilityJack Gallifant, Shan Chen, Kuleen Sasse, Hugo J. W. L. Aerts et al.EMNLP 2025
- Mechanistic Permutability: Match Features Across LayersNikita Balagansky, Ian Maksimov, Daniil GavrilovICLR 2025
