Sparse Autoencoders Learn Monosemantic Features in Vision-Language Models
Mateusz Pach, Shyamgopal Karthik, Quentin Bouniot, Serge J. Belongie, Zeynep Akata
Abstract
Sparse Autoencoders (SAEs) have recently gained attention as a means to improve the interpretability and steerability of Large Language Models (LLMs), both of which are essential for AI safety. In this work, we extend the application of SAEs to Vision-Language Models (VLMs), such as CLIP, and introduce a comprehensive framework for evaluating monosemanticity at the neuron-level in visual representations. To ensure that our evaluation aligns with human perception, we propose a benchmark derived from a large-scale user study. Our experimental results reveal that SAEs trained on VLMs significantly enhance the monosemanticity of individual neurons, with sparsity and wide latents being the most influential factors. Further, we demonstrate that applying SAE interventions on CLIP's vision encoder directly steers multimodal LLM outputs (e.g., LLaVA), without any modifications to the underlying language model. These findings emphasize the practicality and efficacy of SAEs as an unsupervised tool for enhancing both interpretability and control of VLMs. Code and benchmark data are available at https://github.com/ExplainableML/sae-for-vlm.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 05238345-68b8-4c93-897d-4ab91458985cCited by top-tier papers29
- Vision-and-Language Training Helps Deploy Taxonomic Knowledge but Does Not Fundamentally Alter ItYulu Qin, Dheeraj Varghese, Adam Dahlgren Lindström, Lucia Donatelli et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 11 citations
- Cross-Modal Redundancy and the Geometry of Vision-Language EmbeddingsGrégoire Dhimoïla, Thomas Fel, Victor Boutin, Agustin M. PicardICLR 2026 · 9 citations
- Interpretable Debiasing of Vision-Language Models for Social FairnessNa Min An, Yoonna Jang, Yusuke Hirota, Ryo Hachiuma et al.CVPR 2026 · 7 citations
- Interpretable and Steerable Concept Bottleneck Sparse AutoencodersAkshay Kulkarni, Tsui-Wei Weng, Vivek Narayanaswamy, Shusen Liu et al.CVPR 2026 · 6 citations
- ActivationReasoning: Logical Reasoning in Latent Activation SpacesLukas Helff, Ruben Härle, Wolfgang Stammer, Felix Friedrich et al.ICLR 2026 · 6 citations
Builds on31
- Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language SupervisionAlec Radford, Jong Wook Kim, Chris Hallacy, Aditya Ramesh et al.ICML 2021 · 47,906 citations
- Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic ModelsJonathan Ho, Ajay Jain, Pieter AbbeelNeurIPS 2020 · 35,902 citations
- Visual Instruction TuningHaotian Liu, Chunyuan Li, Qingyang Wu, Yong Jae LeeNeurIPS 2023 · 11,349 citations
- InstructBLIP: Towards General-purpose Vision-Language Models with Instruction TuningWenliang Dai, Junnan Li, Dongxu Li, Anthony Meng Huat Tiong et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 4,013 citations
- Sigmoid Loss for Language Image Pre-TrainingXiaohua Zhai, Basil Mustafa, Alexander Kolesnikov, Lucas BeyerICCV 2023 · 2,932 citations
Related papers
- VL-SAE: Interpreting and Enhancing Vision-Language Alignment with a Unified Concept SetShufan Shen, Junshu Sun, Qingming Huang, Shuhui WangNeurIPS 2025 · 13 citations
- Interpreting CLIP with Hierarchical Sparse AutoencodersVladimir Zaigrajew, Hubert Baniecki, Przemyslaw BiecekICML 2025
- Sparse CLIP: Co-Optimizing Interpretability and Performance in Contrastive LearningChuan Qin, Constantin Venhoff, Sonia Joseph, Fanyi Xiao et al.ICLR 2026 · 4 citations
- On the Limits of Sparse Autoencoders: A Theoretical Framework and Reweighted RemedyJingyi Cui, Qi Zhang, Yifei Wang, Yisen WangICLR 2026 · 16 citations
- Rethinking Evaluation of Sparse Autoencoders through the Representation of Polysemous WordsGouki Minegishi, Hiroki Furuta, Yusuke Iwasawa, Yutaka MatsuoICLR 2025
