On the Limits of Sparse Autoencoders: A Theoretical Framework and Reweighted Remedy
Jingyi Cui, Qi Zhang, Yifei Wang, Yisen Wang
Abstract
Sparse autoencoders (SAEs) have recently emerged as a powerful tool for interpreting the features learned by large language models (LLMs). By reconstructing features with sparsely activated networks, SAEs aim to recover complex superposed polysemantic features into interpretable monosemantic ones. Despite their wide applications, it remains unclear under what conditions SAEs can fully recover the ground truth monosemantic features from the superposed polysemantic ones. In this paper, we provide the first theoretical analysis with a closed-form solution for SAEs, revealing that they generally fail to fully recover the ground truth monosemantic features unless the ground truth features are extremely sparse. To improve the feature recovery of SAEs in general cases, we propose a reweighting strategy targeting at enhancing the reconstruction of the ground truth monosemantic features instead of the observed polysemantic ones. We further establish a theoretical weight selection principle for our proposed weighted SAE (WSAE). Experiments across multiple settings validate our theoretical findings and demonstrate that our WSAE significantly improves feature monosemanticity and interpretability.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 36b0ad54-e4cb-4112-923a-ec07f7bffb03Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on14
- Pythia: A Suite for Analyzing Large Language Models Across Training and ScalingStella Biderman, Hailey Schoelkopf, Quentin Gregory Anthony, Herbie Bradley et al.ICML 2023 · 1,822 citations
- Sparse Autoencoders Find Highly Interpretable Features in Language ModelsRobert Huben, Hoagy Cunningham, Logan Riggs Smith, Aidan Ewart et al.ICLR 2024 · 1,072 citations
- Identifying Functionally Important Features with End-to-End Sparse Dictionary LearningDan Braun, Jordan Taylor, Nicholas Goldowsky-Dill, Lee SharkeyNeurIPS 2024 · 81 citations
- Identifiable Contrastive Learning with Automatic Feature Importance DiscoveryQi Zhang, Yifei Wang, Yisen WangNeurIPS 2023 · 18 citations
- Scaling and evaluating sparse autoencodersLeo Gao, Tom Dupré la Tour, Henk Tillman, Gabriel Goh et al.ICLR 2025 · 10 citations
Related papers
- Rethinking Evaluation of Sparse Autoencoders through the Representation of Polysemous WordsGouki Minegishi, Hiroki Furuta, Yusuke Iwasawa, Yutaka MatsuoICLR 2025
- Sparse but Wrong: Incorrect L0 Leads to Incorrect Features in Sparse AutoencodersDavid Chanin, Adrià Garriga-AlonsoICML 2026 · 8 citations
- Taming Polysemanticity in LLMs: Theory-Grounded Feature Recovery via Sparse AutoencodersSiyu Chen, Heejune Sheen, Xuyuan Xiong, Tianhao Wang et al.ICLR 2026 · 1 citation
- A is for Absorption: Studying Feature Splitting and Absorption in Sparse AutoencodersDavid Chanin, James Wilken-Smith, Tomás Dulka, Hardik Bhatnagar et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 168 citations
- Improving Sparse Decomposition of Language Model Activations with Gated Sparse AutoencodersSenthooran Rajamanoharan, Arthur Conmy, Lewis Smith, Tom Lieberum et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 49 citations
