Identifying Functionally Important Features with End-to-End Sparse Dictionary Learning
Dan Braun, Jordan Taylor, Nicholas Goldowsky-Dill, Lee Sharkey
Abstract
Identifying the features learned by neural networks is a core challenge in mechanistic interpretability. Sparse autoencoders (SAEs), which learn a sparse, overcomplete dictionary that reconstructs a network's internal activations, have been used to identify these features. However, SAEs may learn more about the structure of the datatset than the computational structure of the network. There is therefore only indirect reason to believe that the directions found in these dictionaries are functionally important to the network. We propose end-to-end (e2e) sparse dictionary learning, a method for training SAEs that ensures the features learned are functionally important by minimizing the KL divergence between the output distributions of the original model and the model with SAE activations inserted. Compared to standard SAEs, e2e SAEs offer a Pareto improvement: They explain more network performance, require fewer total features, and require fewer simultaneously active features per datapoint, all with no cost to interpretability. We explore geometric and qualitative differences between e2e SAE features and standard SAE features. E2e dictionary learning brings us closer to methods that can explain network behavior concisely and accurately. We release our library for training e2e SAEs and reproducing our analysis at https://github.com/ApolloResearch/e2e_sae
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 4c2a9f45-06c3-4a2b-9bc7-0ef55dd9c0b4Cited by top-tier papers22
- Sparse Autoencoders Trained on the Same Data Learn Different FeaturesGonçalo Paulo, Nora BelroseICLR 2026 · 96 citations
- Automated Interpretability Metrics Do Not Distinguish Trained and Random TransformersThomas Heap, Tim Lawson, Lucy Farnik, Laurence AitchisonICLR 2026 · 32 citations
- Obfuscated Activations Bypass LLM Latent-Space DefensesLuke Bailey, Alex Serrano, Abhay Sheshadri, Mikhail Seleznyov et al.ICLR 2026 · 28 citations
- I Predict Therefore I Am: Is Next Token Prediction Enough to Learn Human-Interpretable Concepts from Data?Yuhang Liu, Dong Gong, Yichao Cai, Erdun Gao et al.ICLR 2026 · 17 citations
- On the Limits of Sparse Autoencoders: A Theoretical Framework and Reweighted RemedyJingyi Cui, Qi Zhang, Yifei Wang, Yisen WangICLR 2026 · 16 citations
Builds on5
- Sparse Autoencoders Find Highly Interpretable Features in Language ModelsRobert Huben, Hoagy Cunningham, Logan Riggs Smith, Aidan Ewart et al.ICLR 2024 · 1,072 citations
- Codebook Features: Sparse and Discrete Interpretability for Neural NetworksAlex Tamkin, Mohammad Taufeeque, Noah D. GoodmanICML 2024 · 42 citations
- Towards Principled Evaluations of Sparse Autoencoders for Interpretability and ControlAleksandar Makelov, Georg Lange, Neel NandaICLR 2025
- Sparse Feature Circuits: Discovering and Editing Interpretable Causal Graphs in Language ModelsSamuel Marks, Can Rager, Eric J. Michaud, Yonatan Belinkov et al.ICLR 2025
- Causal Analysis of Syntactic Agreement Mechanisms in Neural Language ModelsMatthew Finlayson, Aaron Mueller, Sebastian Gehrmann, Stuart M. Shieber et al.ACL 2021
Related papers
- Temporal Sparse Autoencoders: Leveraging the Sequential Nature of Language for InterpretabilityUsha Bhalla, Alex Oesterling, Claudio Mayrink Verdun, Himabindu Lakkaraju et al.ICLR 2026 · 18 citations
- Toward Identifiable Sparse AutoencodersWalter Nelson, Theofanis Karaletsos, Francesco LocatelloICML 2026 · 1 citation
- Sparse Autoencoders Do Not Find Canonical Units of AnalysisPatrick Leask, Bart Bussmann, Michael T. Pearce, Joseph Isaac Bloom et al.ICLR 2025
- Mechanistic Interpretability Should Prioritize Feature Consistency in Sparse AutoencodersXiangchen Song, Aashiq Muhamed, Yujia Zheng, Lingjing Kong et al.ACL 2026
- Projecting Assumptions: The Duality Between Sparse Autoencoders and Concept GeometrySai Sumedh R. Hindupur, Ekdeep Singh Lubana, Thomas Fel, Demba BaNeurIPS 2025 · 65 citations
